Grammatical Tag Processing for Template Text Generation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing natural language generation techniques, such as template-based and linguistic-based methods, face limitations in flexibility and complexity, struggling to account for grammatical context, style, and tone variations, requiring numerous templates or complex algorithms, and often fail to generate grammatically correct text efficiently.

Innovation Solution

The use of templates with grammatical tags that indicate actor characteristics, such as subject-verb agreement and verb conjugation, along with parameters to determine proper text generation, and a post-generation analysis for correcting grammatical errors like punctuation, capitalization, and spacing, allows for flexible and efficient generation of human-readable text.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If template-based natural language generation techniques are used, then text generation is simplified, but the system fails to account for grammatical context, style, and tone variations, requiring numerous templates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemplate complexityVSAvoidgrammatical context adaptation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by introducing grammatical tags with parameters (such as subject number, person, tense, mood, voice) that dynamically control template instantiation. Instead of creating numerous static templates for different grammatical contexts, the system uses a single template that adapts its behavior based on parameter values provided by the grammatical tag processor, thereby reducing template complexity while maintaining grammatical adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamics by making the template processing system adaptive rather than static. The grammatical tag processor dynamically determines appropriate parameter values based on the semantic structure and grammatical context, allowing the same template to generate grammatically correct variations for different contexts (e.g., singular/plural subjects, different tenses, active/passive voice) without requiring separate templates for each case

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If linguistic-based natural language generation methods are used, then grammatical context can be accounted for, but the algorithms become complex and require numerous templates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrammatical accuracyVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the natural language generation process into distinct functional components: a template processor that handles text generation, a grammatical tag processor that analyzes semantic structure and determines grammatical parameters, and a template instantiation mechanism that combines them. This segmentation allows each component to specialize in one aspect, reducing overall algorithmic complexity while maintaining grammatical accuracy through coordinated operation of the parts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism in the form of grammatical tags that serve as a bridge between the semantic content and the grammatical structure. The grammatical tag processor acts as an intermediary that translates semantic information into grammatical parameters, which then guide template instantiation. This intermediary approach simplifies the overall algorithm by providing a clear interface between semantic analysis and grammatical generation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If numerous templates are used to account for grammatical variations, then grammatical accuracy improves, but the system complexity and maintenance burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrammatical correctnessVSAvoidtemplate maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by designing a single template structure that can serve multiple grammatical functions through parameter-based instantiation. Instead of maintaining separate templates for different grammatical contexts (singular/plural, past/present, active/passive), the system uses one universal template that adapts its output based on parameter values from the grammatical tag processor, dramatically reducing the number of templates to maintain while preserving grammatical correctness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8150676B1Methods and apparatus for processing grammatical tags in a template to generate text
Publication Date: 2012.04.03 YSEOP
  • US8150676B1 patent drawing
  • US8150676B1 patent drawing
  • US8150676B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Method and apparatus for automatically generating text in a human language using a template. The template may include at least one grammatical tag that implicates at least one actor in a sentence in the template. Human-language text may be determined to fill in the tag based on a characteristic of the actor, such as, for example, the actor's gender, whether the actor is singular or plural, or some other characteristic of the actor.