Granular Access Control for Shared Digital Items

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing digital item sharing systems lack granular control over access permissions, making it difficult for users to manage who can view and annotate digital items, especially in contexts like instant messaging and online dating applications.

Innovation Solution

A system that allows users to control access permissions for digital items and annotations through a graphical user interface, enabling users to selectively permit or deny access to specific items and annotations based on communication identities, with features like category-based access and delegation of authority.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If digital items are shared with multiple communication identities, then the quantity of shared content increases, but the complexity of managing access permissions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantity of shared digital itemsVSAvoidcomplexity of access permission management
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments access permissions by creating distinct permission levels (view-only, view-and-annotate, full access) and applies them to different digital items and communication identities. This segmentation allows the system to manage multiple shared items without requiring individual permission configurations for each item-identity pair, thereby reducing management complexity while maintaining granular control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by allowing different permission levels to be assigned to different digital items and different communication identities. Each digital item can have customized access rules for specific users, enabling precise control over who can view or annotate which items, thus managing complexity through localized permission settings rather than global rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If access permission control is made granular, then the precision of access control improves, but the complexity of the permission management system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of access controlVSAvoidcomplexity of permission management system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic permission management where the list owner can modify access permissions at any time. The system dynamically updates permission states based on user actions (granting, revoking, upgrading, or downgrading access levels) without requiring system reconfiguration. This dynamic approach maintains high precision control while managing complexity through automated updates rather than static, rigid permission structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs an intermediary permission management mechanism that mediates between the list owner and communication identities. The system automatically enforces permission rules and controls access based on predefined levels, acting as an intermediary that simplifies the interaction between users and the complex permission structure. Users interact with simple permission levels rather than directly managing complex access control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If users can annotate shared digital items, then the value of shared content increases, but the risk of unauthorized modification increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalue of shared contentVSAvoidrisk of unauthorized modification
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by assigning annotation permissions selectively to specific communication identities for specific digital items. Not all users have annotation rights for all items; instead, the list owner can grant or revoke annotation permissions on a per-item, per-user basis. This localized permission assignment enables content enhancement through annotations while preventing unauthorized modifications by restricting annotation rights to authorized users only.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary anti-action by establishing permission validation checks before allowing annotation actions. The system preemptively prevents unauthorized modifications by verifying user permissions before permitting annotation operations. This preliminary check blocks potential harmful actions (unauthorized annotations) before they occur, while still allowing authorized users to enhance content value through annotations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS10671803B2Annotation of digital items in a shared list
Publication Date: 2020.06.02 VERIZON PATENT & LICENSING INC
  • US10671803B2 patent drawing
  • US10671803B2 patent drawing
  • US10671803B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are described for user-controlled annotation and sharing of one or more digital items. Examples of digital items that may be shared with other users include digital representations of graphic images, photographs, audio segments, songs, video segments, movies, and text (such as lists of favorites (e.g., a list of favorite books, a list of favorite movies, and a list of favorite places to visit)). A user may make a digital item available to other users of a computer network, such as an instant messaging system, a chat environment, or a subscription-based computer network. User-entered annotations, such as textual comments, may be associated with a digital item, and a user can select which other users can view and/or change all, or some, of the annotations.