Granular Composite Packing for Low Porosity and Viscosity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The complexity of designing granular composites based on constituent geometry and characteristics makes it challenging to predict and control their physical properties, particularly porosity, which affects mechanical strength, viscosity, and other characteristics, necessitating a method to reduce porosity while maintaining low enough viscosity for fabrication processes.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the mixing of specific groups of particles with tailored size distributions to achieve a combined granular composite with reduced porosity, characterized by a passing curve with local maxima and minima, resulting in a hyperuniform or nearly-hyperuniform structure, which reduces phase separation and viscosity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional granular composite mixing methods are used, then the composite can be easily manufactured, but the porosity remains high which reduces mechanical strength and other physical properties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveporosity controlVSAvoidmixing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the granular composite into multiple size groups (e.g., small, medium, large particles) and assigns specific volume fractions to each group. This segmentation allows precise control over porosity by optimizing the distribution of different particle sizes, where smaller particles fill voids between larger particles, thereby reducing overall porosity while maintaining manufacturability through systematic mixing ratios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the particle size distribution parameters by specifying particular volume fractions for different particle size groups (e.g., 0.4-0.6 for small particles, 0.3-0.5 for medium particles, 0.1-0.3 for large particles). By adjusting these parameters, the composite achieves reduced porosity and improved mechanical properties while maintaining ease of manufacture through well-defined mixing proportions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If the porosity is reduced to improve mechanical strength, then the composite becomes stronger, but the viscosity increases making fabrication difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strengthVSAvoidviscosity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating different regions within the composite structure where smaller particles are concentrated in void spaces between larger particles. This local distribution ensures that strength enhancement occurs specifically where needed (in the matrix regions) while maintaining overall flowability. The graded particle size distribution allows the composite to exhibit appropriate viscosity during processing and strength in the final structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Quantity of substance

If a wide range of particle sizes is used to reduce porosity, then the density increases, but phase separation occurs reducing uniformity

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedensityVSAvoidphase separation
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic mixing processes that adapt the mixing intensity and duration based on particle size. Smaller particles receive more intensive mixing to ensure uniform distribution within the matrix, while larger particles are mixed more gently to prevent aggregation. This dynamic approach maintains composition stability and prevents phase separation while achieving high density through efficient void filling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Temperature

If the particle size distribution is optimized for low porosity, then thermal conductivity improves, but the mixing process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal conductivityVSAvoidmixing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-classifying particles into size groups before mixing and determining the optimal volume fractions for each group in advance. This preliminary preparation simplifies the actual mixing process, as the pre-defined ratios (e.g., 0.4-0.6 for small particles, 0.3-0.5 for medium particles, 0.1-0.3 for large particles) guide the mixing operation, reducing complexity while achieving optimized thermal conductivity through reduced porosity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11396044B2Density enhancement methods and compositions
Publication Date: 2022.07.26 HEAVY METAL LLC
  • US11396044B2 patent drawing
  • US11396044B2 patent drawing
  • US11396044B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to granular composite density enhancement, and related methods and compositions. The application where the properties are valuable include but are not limited to: 1) additive manufacturing (“3D printing”) involving metallic, ceramic, cermet, polymer, plastic, or other dry or solvent-suspended powders or gels, 2) concrete materials, 3) solid propellant materials, 4) cermet materials, 5) granular armors, 6) glass-metal and glass-plastic mixtures, and 7) ceramics comprising (or manufactured using) granular composites.