Granulate-Filled Soundproofing Device to Reduce Assembly Costs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing soundproofing devices with multiple flexible layers are costly to assemble and produce, prone to manufacturing errors, and difficult to recycle, while also requiring complex material management for effective sound insulation.

Innovation Solution

A soundproofing device comprising two limp layers connected by elements that maintain a predetermined distance, with the space between filled with pourable granulate, ensuring even distribution and preventing sedimentation, and featuring a closed textile surface to prevent granule penetration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If multiple layers of different materials are used to achieve high soundproofing, then sound insulation performance is improved, but assembly and production costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesound insulation performanceVSAvoidassembly and production costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple sound-absorbing layers into a single composite material layer, eliminating the need to assemble multiple separate layers. This merging approach maintains the sound absorption functionality while significantly reducing assembly complexity and production costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a composite material consisting of a base fabric and attached sound-absorbing particles (such as rubber granules or plastic granules). This composite structure provides effective sound absorption in a single layer, replacing the need for multiple separate material layers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Object-affected harmful factors

If multiple layers of different materials are used to achieve high soundproofing, then sound insulation performance is improved, but production errors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesound insulation performanceVSAvoidproduction errors
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

By merging multiple functional layers into a single composite material, the patent eliminates the cumulative errors that occur during multiple assembly steps. The single-layer composite structure ensures consistent sound absorption performance without the variability introduced by assembling multiple separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If multiple layers of different materials are used to achieve high soundproofing, then sound insulation performance is improved, but recycling difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesound insulation performanceVSAvoidrecycling difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The sound-absorbing particles are attached to the base fabric in a way that allows them to be easily separated and removed. This extraction capability enables the base fabric to be reused and the particles to be recycled, significantly improving the recyclability of the soundproofing material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent design allows for the recovery and reuse of both the base fabric and the sound-absorbing particles. The particles can be detached and reused in new composite materials, while the fabric can be recycled, thereby reducing waste and improving sustainability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

4Ease of manufacture

If a single layer with sound-absorbing particles is used, then production costs are reduced, but granulate distribution uniformity may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction costsVSAvoidgranulate distribution uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The sound-absorbing particles are attached to the fabric in a controlled manufacturing process that ensures uniform distribution before the material is put into service. This preliminary action of proper attachment prevents clustering or uneven distribution, maintaining consistent sound absorption performance across the entire material surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration achieves high sound insulation with reduced production costs, minimized errors, and facilitates recycling, while maintaining flexibility and acoustic effectiveness through the use of granulate distribution and specific material properties.

Implementation Method 1

The effect of soundproofing devices with several flexible layers is based to a large extent on sound absorption

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSound absorption: Acoustic Absorption

Implementation Method 2

friction processes and friction losses at the interfaces between the granules increase the sound insulation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 3

The connecting elements prevent the pourable granules from following the force of weight, sagging downwards and collecting at the lowest point

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitation: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentEP4016521A1Soundproofing device
Publication Date: 2022.06.22 GERRIETS GMBH
  • EP4016521A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4016521A1 patent drawing
  • EP4016521A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A soundproofing device is proposed comprising a flexible first layer (2), a flexible second layer (3), and connecting elements (4) which connect the first layer (2) and the second layer (3) and hold the first layer (2) at a predetermined distance to the second layer (3), wherein the space between the first and second layers (2, 3) is at least partially filled with a pourable granulate.