Graph-Based AI Learning Platform for Scalable Personalization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing educational content delivery systems lack the ability to provide user-specific content at scale, often requiring learners to conform to pre-established pathways, leading to disengagement and suboptimal learning outcomes for individual students.

Innovation Solution

An adaptive and scalable AI-driven personalized learning platform utilizing graph-based Natural Language Processing (NLP) and a contextualized Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT-x) to dynamically tailor learning content and experiences for individual learners, incorporating user feedback and integrating advanced features like learning analytics and emotional intelligence.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If pre-established learning pathways are used to deliver educational content, then content delivery can be standardized and scaled, but individual learners cannot receive personalized content and may become disengaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs AI agents that autonomously analyze learner data, select appropriate content, and adapt learning pathways without requiring manual intervention. The AI self-adjusts based on learner performance and preferences, enabling personalized content delivery while maintaining manageable system complexity through automated decision-making processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously collects feedback from learners through analytics on their interactions, performance, and preferences. This feedback loops back to the AI agents which use it to refine and update learning pathways in real-time, creating a dynamic adaptive system that personalizes content while managing complexity through data-driven iterative improvement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If AI-driven personalized content is generated for each learner, then learning outcomes improve, but the computational resources and processing time required increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelearning effectivenessVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the AI processing into specialized modules: data collection agents, analysis agents, content selection agents, and delivery agents. Each segment handles specific tasks independently, allowing computational work to be divided and optimized. This modular approach reduces overall computational burden while maintaining personalized learning effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary processing of learner data and pre-organizes content into structured pathways before actual learning occurs. AI agents analyze historical data and pre-compute optimal learning sequences, so that during actual learning sessions, the system can quickly retrieve and deliver content without performing heavy real-time computations, thereby reducing energy consumption while maintaining effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If the system tracks and processes extensive learner data to provide personalization, then content relevance improves, but data privacy concerns and security requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelearner profile accuracyVSAvoiddata privacy risks
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces AI agents as intermediaries between data collection and content delivery. These agents process and analyze data locally, transforming raw data into actionable insights without transmitting sensitive information across networks. The agents act as protective intermediaries that enable accurate learner profiling while minimizing data exposure and privacy risks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts only the necessary information from extensive learner data sets to create personalized profiles. Rather than processing all available data, the AI agents selectively identify and use only the critical features needed for personalization, reducing the data volume that requires protection and minimizing privacy risks while maintaining profile accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Adaptability or versatility

If the platform scales to serve more learners with personalized content, then accessibility improves, but the system complexity and infrastructure requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovescalabilityVSAvoidinfrastructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The AI agents are designed as universal, multi-functional units that can serve multiple learners simultaneously. Each agent is capable of handling diverse learning needs, content types, and learner profiles through a single unified architecture. This universality allows the system to scale by simply deploying additional agents rather than building specialized infrastructure for each learner type, thereby improving scalability while managing infrastructure complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250378766A1Systems, methods, and apparatuses for implementing an adaptive and scalable ai-driven personalized learning platform
Publication Date: 2025.12.11 THE ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS ON BEHALF OF THE UNIV OF ARIZONA
  • US20250378766A1 patent drawing
  • US20250378766A1 patent drawing
  • US20250378766A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Processing circuitry of a learning platform may be configured to maintain a graph database describing student learners. Processing circuitry may obtain new student learner data and load the data into the graph database. Processing circuitry may receive an engagement or interaction from the new student learner and responsively extract new learnings about the new student learner which are loaded into the graph database. Processing circuitry may receive an inquiry from the new student learner and in response, extract the new student learner data and the new learnings from the graph database and contextualize, using a large language model, a learning unit from the educational content provided by the learning platform as a response to the inquiry using the new student learner data and the new learnings. Processing circuitry may further return the learning unit contextualized by the large language model to the new student learner.