Graph Database Access Risk Assessment for Critical Applications

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional identity management solutions fail to effectively assess and manage access risks to critical applications, as they primarily focus on user access rather than the broader relationships between applications, client devices, and users, leaving a gap in governance and security for central security experts.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that collect data on relationships between applications and client devices/users, enriching a graph database with metadata to analyze access patterns, generate security policies, and provide visualizations to identify and restrict unauthorized access, using Role-Based Access Control and Zero Trust principles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional identity management solutions focus on user access management, then user access control is simplified, but comprehensive security assessment of critical applications is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser access managementVSAvoidsecurity assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments access management into two distinct views: user-centric management for ease of access control, and application-centric security assessment for comprehensive risk evaluation. This segmentation allows each aspect to be optimized independently while working together to provide both operational simplicity and security reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary security assessment system that bridges user access management and application security requirements. This intermediary layer collects data from multiple sources, analyzes access patterns, and generates security assessments without disrupting the simplicity of user access management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If department administrators manage user access, then access decisions are decentralized and efficient, but security governance for critical applications is weakened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess decision efficiencyVSAvoidsecurity governance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides security governance responsibilities by introducing application-centric security views that are separate from user access management. Department administrators continue to manage user access efficiently, while security experts gain dedicated tools for assessing and governing critical application security without interfering with operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediary security assessment layer is introduced that works parallel to user access management. This intermediary system provides security experts with comprehensive visibility and control over critical application security, while department administrators maintain their efficient user access management without additional security governance burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If access management is focused on users, then user access control is simplified, but holistic assessment of application access risks is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess management systemVSAvoidaccess risk assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the access management ecosystem into user-facing simplified management and security-facing comprehensive assessment. The user-facing side maintains low complexity for ease of use, while the security-facing side introduces comprehensive data collection and analysis capabilities for precise risk assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds a new dimension to access management by introducing application-centric security views and multi-source data integration. This additional dimension enables holistic risk assessment without increasing the complexity of traditional user access management, as the two operate in different dimensional spaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS11777978B2Methods and systems for accurately assessing application access risk
Publication Date: 2023.10.03 GRYPHO5 LLC
  • US11777978B2 patent drawing
  • US11777978B2 patent drawing
  • US11777978B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for assessing an application access risk are provided. An example method commences with collecting data concerning relationships between an application, one or more client devices, and one or more users in a computing environment. The method includes updating a graph database including nodes and edges. The nodes represent the application, the one or more client devices, and the one or more users and the edges represent relationships between the application, the one or more client devices, and the one or more users. The method continues with enriching the graph database by associating the nodes with metadata including information concerning the one or more users accessing the application from the one or more client devices. The method further includes analyzing the graph database to identify a subset of nodes used to access the application and displaying a graphical representation of the subset of nodes.