Graph Database Permission Edges for Fast, Error-Resistant Access Control
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing graph databases face challenges in efficiently editing permissions for nodes and edges, which can be time-consuming, costly, and prone to unintended errors, especially in complex graph databases.
Innovation Solution
A graph database structure with directed edges and nodes having associated properties, including back-edges for efficient traversal, and permission properties defining view, edit, and manage permissions, along with a system for authenticating callers and managing permissions through a root node to prevent orphans and errors.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If permissions are manually edited in complex graph databases, then access control can be implemented, but the process becomes time-consuming and costly
Solution Approach 1:
The system enables self-service permission management where the graph database automatically handles permission assignments and validations based on predefined rules and policies, eliminating the need for manual administrative intervention in routine permission edits
Solution Approach 2:
Permission templates and policies are pre-configured with standard access control rules, allowing the system to automatically apply appropriate permissions without requiring manual configuration for each individual case
2Reliability
If permissions are manually edited in complex graph databases, then access control can be implemented, but the process is subject to unintended errors
Solution Approach 1:
The system provides automated feedback mechanisms including permission validation rules, conflict detection, and policy compliance checks that immediately alert users to potential errors or inconsistencies in permission configurations
Solution Approach 2:
The system implements preemptive error prevention through mandatory permission templates, automated policy enforcement, and validation rules that prevent invalid permission configurations before they can cause errors
3Adaptability or versatility
If complex permission structures are implemented, then fine-grained access control is achieved, but the system complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The permission system is segmented into modular components including permission templates, policies, roles, and individual permissions, allowing complex access control requirements to be broken down into manageable, reusable units
Solution Approach 2:
Permission templates and policies serve multiple functions by encapsulating common permission patterns that can be reused across different nodes and relationships, reducing the need to recreate similar permission structures repeatedly
Data Source
Figure 1
Figure 2a
Figure 2b
AI summary
An internally-constructed permissions graph database enabling a user to construct and alter the graph database permissions within the graph database. Edge permissions define whether a one node can View, Edit, or Manage another node. A node can view another node if there is at least one edge path connecting the nodes having a ''View'' permission. Similarly, a node can ''Edit'' or ''Manage'' another node if there is at least one edge path connecting the nodes having allowing ''Edit'' and/or ''Manage'' permissions, respectively. If a contiguous path of permission edges does not exist from the ''caller node'' to the ''requested node'' to be acted upon, then permission to perform the desired action or operation on that node is not granted. Edges have permissions, and Nodes have properties. A ''Caller Node'' makes Requests upon and ''Requested Node'', which are limited by edge permissions.