Graph-Based Predictive Classifications for Entity Taxonomies

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional classification techniques are prone to misclassification errors due to their broad taxonomies and inability to account for high variance and heterogeneity in predictive domains, such as clinical procedures, leading to information value degradation.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of graph-based approaches to generate empirical domain taxonomies by breaking down entity classes into subclasses based on homogeneous behavior, using network graphs with node and edge weights to create granular predictive classifications tailored to actual entity interactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional broad taxonomies are used for classification, then the classification system is simple and easy to operate, but misclassification errors increase and information value degrades

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification simplicityVSAvoidclassification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments broad entity classes into multiple homogeneous subclasses based on behavioral patterns. For example, instead of classifying all clinical providers under a single taxonomy code, the system divides them into subclasses based on their interaction patterns with patients, procedures, and medications. This segmentation maintains operational simplicity while significantly improving classification accuracy by reducing misclassification errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by creating customized classification criteria for different subclasses within the same entity class. Each subclass is defined by specific behavioral characteristics relevant to that subgroup, rather than applying a uniform classification rule to all entities. This allows the system to capture heterogeneity and reduce information value degradation while maintaining overall system simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Device complexity

If traditional taxonomies are used, then the classification structure is straightforward, but the system cannot account for high variance and heterogeneity in predictive domains

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetaxonomy structureVSAvoidhandling of variance and heterogeneity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamics by making the taxonomy adaptive and evolving based on observed behavioral patterns. Rather than using static, predetermined taxonomies, the system dynamically creates and updates subclasses based on actual entity interactions and behaviors. This allows the classification system to adapt to high variance and heterogeneity in predictive domains while maintaining a straightforward overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements self-service by enabling the classification system to automatically generate and refine its own taxonomy structure based on observed data patterns. The system autonomously identifies homogeneous behavior patterns and creates appropriate subclasses without requiring manual reconfiguration, thereby handling variance and heterogeneity while keeping the taxonomy structure manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If self-designated taxonomy codes are used by entities, then the classification process is simple, but misclassification errors occur due to incorrect self-designation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveself-designation simplicityVSAvoidclassification reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies feedback by using observed behavioral patterns to verify and correct self-designated taxonomy codes. The system monitors entity interactions and compares actual behavior against declared taxonomy classifications, then adjusts classifications accordingly. This feedback mechanism maintains the simplicity of self-designation while significantly improving reliability by reducing misclassification errors through automated verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240303514A1Graph based predictive inferences for domain taxonomy
Publication Date: 2024.09.12 OPTUM INC
  • US20240303514A1 patent drawing
  • US20240303514A1 patent drawing
  • US20240303514A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments of the present disclosure provide graph-based techniques for generating granular predictive classifications for entities in a predictive domain. The graph-based techniques include generating a network graph for an entity or entity class based on a plurality of interaction data objects for the entity. The network graph includes a plurality of nodes and a plurality of edges. Each node corresponds to a particular interaction code of at least one of the plurality of interaction data objects. Each edge connects a node pair that is associated with a particular interaction data object. The nodes and edges are weighted to enable the clustering of the network graph for an entity class. An entity network graph may be compared to node clusters of a class network graph to generate a behavior based predictive classification.