Distributed Graph Query Processing with Dynamic Message Allocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Graph databases and processing systems face challenges in scalability and efficiency, particularly in handling complex computational tasks and maintaining historical data states.

Innovation Solution

A node-centric architecture with asynchronous message-passing and half-edge representation, combined with scalable storage and query mechanisms, allows for efficient processing and querying of graph data across multiple computing devices, supporting historical state retrieval and flexible consistency modes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If graph databases use traditional centralized architecture, then data consistency is maintained, but scalability is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata consistencyVSAvoidscalability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the graph database into multiple independent partitions distributed across different computing devices. Each partition maintains its own data and can be processed independently, enabling horizontal scaling while preserving data consistency within each partition through local transaction management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a new dimensional approach by implementing multi-version concurrency control across distributed partitions. This allows the system to scale horizontally across multiple computing devices while maintaining consistency through versioned data access, effectively adding a scalability dimension without sacrificing reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If graph processing systems allocate message processors to all nodes, then query processing speed is improved, but resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequery processing speedVSAvoidresource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic message processor allocation where processors are assigned to nodes based on current workload and query requirements rather than being permanently allocated. This dynamic allocation allows the system to optimize query processing speed by activating processors only when needed, thereby reducing overall resource consumption while maintaining high productivity during peak operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters of message processors by adjusting their activation state based on system load and query complexity. Processors can be scaled up or down dynamically, changing their resource consumption parameters while maintaining the capability for high-speed processing when required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If graph databases store complete historical states, then historical query accuracy is improved, but storage requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehistorical query accuracyVSAvoidstorage requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential state information required for historical queries rather than storing complete historical states. By identifying and retaining only the critical data elements needed for accurate historical reconstruction, the system maintains query accuracy while significantly reducing storage requirements through selective data retention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by storing a representative subset of historical states rather than complete states. This partial storage approach uses sampling and selective retention of key state changes to maintain sufficient historical query accuracy without the exponential storage growth that would result from storing every complete historical state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12505163B2Graph processing system
Publication Date: 2025.12.23 THATDOT INC
  • US12505163B2 patent drawing
  • US12505163B2 patent drawing
  • US12505163B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A graph comprising nodes and edges is stored by a distributed system as a collection of nodes and half-edges stored with their respective nodes. A message processor is associated with a node as needed to process messages passed between nodes, such that a given node has zero or one message processor assigned to it at a given time. Queries of the graph are resolved by processing a first portion of the query at a first node, and forwarding the results with the remaining portions of the query to a node linked by an edge to the present node.