Graph Database Query Autocomplete for Comprehensive Syntax Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional graph database query statement editors only complete specific user input, lacking comprehensive auto-completion options, which hinders query efficiency.

Innovation Solution

Implement a method and apparatus that automatically complete query statements for graph databases by querying syntax keywords, object categories, and attribute categories based on user input characters, using a target query language, and determining matching keywords as auto-complete content.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the editor only completes specific content input by the user, then the completion function is simple to implement, but the comprehensiveness of auto-complete options is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensiveness of auto-complete optionsVSAvoidcomplexity of completion function
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The query statement editor is enhanced to provide multiple types of auto-completion functionality simultaneously: syntax keyword completion, object category completion, and attribute category completion. This multi-functional approach allows the editor to handle various completion scenarios within a single system, improving comprehensiveness without requiring separate tools for each completion type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The auto-completion function is divided into distinct modules: a syntax keyword completion module that handles SQL syntax elements, an object category completion module that handles table and column names, and an attribute category completion module that handles data types and constraints. Each module operates independently but integrates seamlessly, allowing the system to provide comprehensive completion options while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If manual input of query statements is used, then the system is simple to operate, but the query input efficiency is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequery input efficiencyVSAvoidoperation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The query statement editor implements self-service auto-completion by automatically analyzing the user's input and providing relevant completion suggestions without requiring manual intervention. The system detects the current input context, queries the appropriate completion data from the graph database schema, and presents relevant options to the user, thereby improving input efficiency while maintaining ease of operation through automatic context-aware suggestions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The editor implements real-time feedback mechanisms where the system continuously monitors user input and dynamically updates completion suggestions based on the current query context. As the user types, the system provides immediate feedback by suggesting relevant syntax keywords, object categories, and attribute categories that match the current input state, allowing users to quickly complete queries with minimal effort while maintaining simple operation through context-aware suggestions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250291850A1Methods and apparatuses for automatically completing query statement for graph database
Publication Date: 2025.09.18 ALIPAY (HANGZHOU) INFORMATION TECH CO LTD
  • US20250291850A1 patent drawing
  • US20250291850A1 patent drawing
  • US20250291850A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Automatically completing a query statement for a graph database, includes a current input character in a process where a user inputs a graph database query statement based on a target query language. Multiple syntax keywords for matching target keywords are queried based on at least the current input character when the current input character is not a predetermined character, where the predetermined character is a reserved character of the target query language. The matched target keywords are determined as auto-complete content corresponding to the current input character.