Graph Shortcut Edge Deletion for Search Integrity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional technologies for generating graph data by deleting shortcut edges often result in excessive deletion, lacking sufficient consideration for processing procedures and determination conditions, leading to inefficient graph generation.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus that acquires first graph information and condition information to determine and delete shortcut edges based on specific determination conditions, generating a second graph with optimized edge deletion to maintain graph structure integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If shortcut edges are deleted from the graph, then the number of edges is reduced and search efficiency is improved, but the graph structure integrity may be compromised and excessive deletion occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch efficiencyVSAvoidgraph structure integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by introducing specific determination conditions (Equations 1-3) that evaluate multiple parameters including node degrees, edge weights, and path lengths before deleting shortcut edges. This ensures that only edges meeting specific parameter thresholds are removed, maintaining graph integrity while improving search efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms by continuously evaluating whether deletion conditions are satisfied before removing edges. The determination conditions act as feedback loops that prevent excessive deletion by checking if the graph structure still maintains necessary connectivity and performance characteristics after each potential edge removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Speed

If conventional shortcut edge deletion is performed, then processing speed is improved, but determination conditions are insufficient and excessive edges are deleted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidedge deletion accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the edge deletion process into distinct evaluation stages by separating the determination of deletion conditions into specific equations. Each equation evaluates different aspects (node degrees, path lengths, edge weights) independently, allowing for precise control over which edges are deleted while maintaining processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces multiple parameters for evaluating edge deletion candidates including node degrees (deg(u), deg(v)), path lengths (d(u,w), d(w,v)), and edge weights (w(u,v)). By changing from simple deletion criteria to multi-parameter evaluation, the system achieves both speed and precision in edge deletion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If the number of edges is reduced, then search performance is improved, but the graph may lose important connectivity information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch performanceVSAvoidconnectivity information
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses feedback through determination conditions that check whether alternative paths exist before deleting edges. The conditions evaluate connectivity metrics to ensure that removing an edge does not lose critical connectivity information, maintaining search performance while preserving graph structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary evaluation of edge deletion candidates using determination conditions before actual deletion. This preliminary action assesses whether removing an edge would lose important connectivity information by checking for alternative paths and evaluating graph structure impact in advance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20260050633A1Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and non-transitory computer-readable recording medium
Publication Date: 2026.02.19 LY CORP
  • US20260050633A1 patent drawing
  • US20260050633A1 patent drawing
  • US20260050633A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing apparatus according to the present application includes an acquisition unit that acquires first graph information indicating a first graph in which a plurality of nodes corresponding to each of a plurality of objects to be searched are connected by edges and condition information indicating a determination condition of a shortcut edge to be deleted in a graph, and a generation unit that generates second information indicating a second graph in which the edge satisfies the determination condition of the shortcut edge is deleted as the shortcut edge from the first graph.