Asynchronous Graph Trace Approximation via Randomized Sampling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional methods for calculating the trace of an implicitly defined adjacency matrix are computationally expensive, especially for large-scale graphs, due to direct computation or full matrix diagonalization.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method for calculating a trace approximation of an adjacency matrix involves retrieving the adjacency matrix, determining a random vector, generating a matrix-vector product, selecting a subset of entries, forming a diagonal random matrix from canonical outer products, and iteratively calculating the trace approximation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If direct computation or full matrix diagonalization is used to calculate the trace of an adjacency matrix, then measurement precision is improved, but computational power and time requirements worsen significantly for large-scale graphs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrace calculation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational power requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by computing only a subset of the full matrix diagonalization process. Instead of calculating the complete trace through full diagonalization, the method computes a randomized trace approximation using only k randomly selected rows, where k < n (the dimension of the matrix). This partial computation achieves sufficient accuracy for many applications while dramatically reducing computational requirements from O(n³) to approximately O(k·n²).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses copying by creating a randomized approximation of the trace rather than the exact trace. The method generates a random vector x and computes the expectation E[x^T A x], which serves as an unbiased estimator of the trace. This copied/estimated value provides sufficient accuracy for many graph analytics applications without requiring the expensive exact computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If full matrix diagonalization is performed to calculate the trace, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time worsens significantly for large-scale graphs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrace calculation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent reduces computational time by performing partial diagonalization through random sampling. The method selects k random rows from the n×n adjacency matrix and computes trace approximations using only these rows, reducing the time complexity from O(n³) for full diagonalization to approximately O(k·n²) where k is typically much smaller than n. This partial action maintains sufficient accuracy for many graph analytics tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a time-efficient copy of the trace calculation through randomized estimation. By computing E[x^T A x] for random vectors x, the method produces an unbiased estimator of the trace that can be computed much faster than exact diagonalization. This copied approach trades minimal accuracy loss for significant time savings, making it feasible for large-scale graphs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If direct computation methods are used for trace calculation, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrace calculation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent simplifies the computational system by implementing only the essential components needed for randomized trace estimation. Instead of requiring full matrix diagonalization capabilities, the system only needs to: (1) generate random vectors, (2) perform matrix-vector multiplications, and (3) compute expectations. This partial implementation reduces device complexity while maintaining sufficient measurement precision for graph analytics applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a simplified copying approach where the trace calculation is replaced by computing E[x^T A x] for random vectors. This copied method requires significantly simpler computational operations - essentially only random vector generation and matrix-vector multiplications - rather than complex full diagonalization algorithms, thereby reducing device complexity while preserving adequate accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20250181465A1Asynchronous modeled system to perform graph analytics on fault-tolerant environments
Publication Date: 2025.06.05 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20250181465A1 patent drawing
  • US20250181465A1 patent drawing
  • US20250181465A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for randomized trace approximation calculation based on asynchronous computing architecture is disclosed. The system retrieves an adjacency matrix associated with a complex graph. The system determines a random vector based on the retrieved adjacency matrix. The system generates a matrix-vector based on the adjacency matrix and the random vector. The system determines a first set of natural numbers based on the first dimension of the adjacency matrix. The system selects a subset of entries from the generated matrix-vector based on the determined first set of natural numbers. The system determines a diagonal random matrix based on a summation of canonical outer products formed by the selected subset of entries. The system calculates a trace approximation of the adjacency matrix based on the determined diagonal random matrix and the selected subset of entries and stores the calculated trace approximation of the adjacency matrix.