Graphene Dispersion via Air Flow Shear Exfoliation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current graphene dispersion preparation techniques face challenges such as waste water pollution, toxic waste exhaust, high production costs, low carbon yield, and low solid content, which hinder commercialization and processability in the coating field.

Innovation Solution

An air flow generating device is used to produce a graphene powder with low oxygen content, enabling the creation of a high-concentration graphene dispersion with adjustable solid content and improved processability, utilizing a continuous physical method that avoids chemical modifications and excessive dispersing agents.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If chemical modification process is used to prepare graphene dispersion, then dispersion quality is improved, but environmental pollution and toxic waste are generated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedispersion qualityVSAvoidenvironmental pollution
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces chemical modification processes with a mechanical exfoliation system consisting of a high-speed rotor and stator. The mechanical shear forces generated by the rotating components physically separate graphene layers from graphite without using chemical reagents, thereby eliminating environmental pollution while maintaining dispersion quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses strong mechanical shear forces generated by the high-speed rotating rotor (speed ratio 2:1 to 5:1) to accelerate the physical exfoliation of graphene layers. This mechanical energy input replaces chemical oxidation processes, achieving effective graphene separation without toxic chemicals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #38Strong oxidants (Accelerated oxidation)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If physical method such as mechanical peeling, ultrasonic oscillation, and ball milling is used, then environmental protection is achieved, but carbon yield is reduced and production cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental protectionVSAvoidcarbon yield
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a dynamic high-speed rotating rotor-stator system where the rotor rotates at a speed 2:1 to 5:1 faster than the stator. This dynamic speed differential creates intense shear forces that efficiently exfoliate graphene layers, significantly improving carbon yield compared to static or low-speed mechanical methods while maintaining environmental protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses periodic high-speed rotation and reversal of the rotor to continuously apply shear forces from different directions. This periodic mechanical action prevents graphene aggregation and maintains high exfoliation efficiency throughout the process, improving overall carbon yield.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Ease of operation

If low solid content graphene dispersion is used, then processability is improved, but resin properties and rheology control become problematic

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveprocessabilityVSAvoidsolid content
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the solid content parameter of graphene dispersion from typical low concentrations (0.1-1%) to high concentrations (5-50%). The high-speed mechanical exfoliation system enables effective dispersion at these elevated solid contents by generating sufficient shear forces to prevent aggregation, thereby improving both processability and rheology control while reducing solvent usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If surface modification and excess dispersing agent are used to enhance graphene dispersion, then dispersion quality is improved, but intrinsic properties of graphene coating are destroyed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedispersion qualityVSAvoidintrinsic properties of graphene
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the need for dispersing agents and surface modification chemicals by using pure mechanical exfoliation. The high-speed rotor-stator system generates sufficient shear forces to achieve stable graphene dispersion without any chemical additives, thereby preserving the intrinsic properties of graphene while maintaining excellent dispersion quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution results in a graphene dispersion with high yield, stable suspension, and reduced manufacturing costs, addressing environmental and commercialization needs by enhancing the uniformity and compatibility of graphene in coatings, while maintaining the material's intrinsic properties.

Implementation Method 1

When the rotating awl rotates in the chamber, an upward cyclone having a horizontal component is produced via the screw threads and the slit spacing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCyclone flow: Cyclone Separation

Implementation Method 2

graphene powder with low oxygen content... prepared by the air flow generating device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShear stress exfoliation: Shear Stress

Data Source

PatentUS11142650B2Air flow generating device, graphene dispersion, and preparation method thereof
Publication Date: 2021.10.12 TAIWAN TEXTILE RESEARCH INSTITUTE
  • US11142650B2 patent drawing
  • US11142650B2 patent drawing
  • US11142650B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An air flow generating device, a graphene dispersion, and a preparation method thereof are provided. The graphene dispersion is formed by a graphene powder and a processing solvent, wherein the graphene in the graphene dispersion has an average diameter of 0.5 μm to 1 μm, 3 to 5 layers, a solid content of 5% to 50%, and a residue oxygen content less than 1 wt %, and after being left to stand for 12 hours, the graphene dispersion has a distribution concentration increasing from the top section to the bottom section of the storage container, a viscosity of 5000 cps to 8000 cps, and a graphene concentration of 20 wt %.