Graphene Biosensor Interfacial Nanoarchitecture for Stable Immobilization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current graphene-based biosensors face challenges such as high heterogeneity, decreased repeatability, and stability due to direct covalent attachment of recognition elements, which impairs charge transport and sensitivity, and lack suitable nanoarchitectures for immobilization and antifouling properties, especially for small volume samples and multiplex diagnostics.

Innovation Solution

A sensor with a pre-treated graphene oxide sheet and coplanar interdigitated electrodes, featuring an interfacial nanoarchitecture for non-covalent immobilization of recognition elements and a polymeric coating to enhance stability and specificity, allowing for low-volume sample analysis and multiplex diagnostics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If direct covalent attachment of recognition elements to graphene is used, then immobilization strength is improved, but charge transport is impaired and sensitivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimmobilization strengthVSAvoidsensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an interfacial nanoarchitecture comprising a structural element as an intermediary between the recognition element and the graphene surface. This structural element provides a platform for immobilization without direct covalent bonding to graphene, thereby maintaining charge transport while achieving stable recognition element attachment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the immobilization system into distinct functional layers: the graphene channel for charge transport, the interfacial nanoarchitecture with structural element for immobilization support, and the recognition element for analyte detection. This segmentation allows each component to perform its function optimally without interfering with others.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If graphene materials are used for high conductivity and large specific area, then detection sensitivity is improved, but material heterogeneity increases resulting in decreased repeatability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection sensitivityVSAvoidrepeatability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs reduced graphene oxide (rGO) with controlled reduction degree as a substitute for pristine graphene. This parameter change in the material structure provides more uniform electrical properties and reduced heterogeneity while maintaining high conductivity and sensitivity, thereby improving repeatability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite material systems combining rGO with the interfacial nanoarchitecture and polymeric coating. This composite approach allows optimization of individual material properties: rGO provides conductivity and sensitivity, while the polymeric coating provides structural uniformity and stability, collectively improving repeatability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Ease of manufacture

If covalent functionalization of graphene is performed, then recognition element attachment is achieved, but lattice defects increase hindering charge transport

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment capabilityVSAvoidsignal transduction
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The interfacial nanoarchitecture acts as a mediator that enables recognition element attachment without requiring covalent functionalization of the graphene lattice. The structural element within this architecture provides attachment sites while the graphene channel remains intact for efficient charge transport and signal transduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the covalent bonding mechanism (chemical system) with non-covalent interactions mediated by the interfacial nanoarchitecture. This substitution avoids lattice defects while achieving stable immobilization, preserving the graphene's electrical properties for effective signal transduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Ease of manufacture

If conventional sensor design is used, then fabrication is simplified, but suitability for small volume samples and multiplex diagnostics is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabrication simplicityVSAvoidsuitability for small volume samples
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adopts a coplanar interdigitated electrode configuration where source, drain, and gate electrodes lie in the same plane. This dimensional arrangement enables compact sensor design that is highly suitable for small volume samples and allows integration of multiple sensors for multiplex diagnostics while maintaining fabrication simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The interfacial nanoarchitecture with the structural element serves multiple functions: it provides immobilization for recognition elements, enables anti-fouling properties through polymeric coating, and maintains compatibility with various electrode configurations. This multi-functionality makes the sensor adaptable to different applications including small volume analysis and multiplex diagnostics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a stable and sensitive biosensor capable of detecting analytes in small volumes with improved reproducibility and antifouling properties, enhancing the specificity and stability of the sensor signal while maintaining charge transport efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

sensors based on field-effect transistors comprising semiconducting two-dimensional nanosheets

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectField-effect transistor principle: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 2

a gate electrode coplanar with the source electrode and the drain electrode

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric field effect: Electric Field

Implementation Method 3

an interfacial nanoarchitecture comprising a recognition element, a structural element and a polymeric coating

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNon-covalent interaction: Adsorption

Implementation Method 4

a polymeric coating that allows for the elimination of signals that are non-specific to a target analyte

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAntifouling effect: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentUS20230236147A1Sensors and systems based on field-effect transistors, methods of preparation and devices for their operation
Publication Date: 2023.07.27 GISENS BIOTECH SA
  • US20230236147A1 patent drawing
  • US20230236147A1 patent drawing
  • US20230236147A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A sensor comprising a field-effect transistor of a semiconducting material in two-dimensional nanosheets having an interfacial nanoarchitecture comprising a recognition element, a structural element and a polymeric coating, a gate electrode of the transistor being coplanar with a drain electrode and a source electrode of the transistor; a system using the sensor and methods of preparation and use thereof. The disclosed sensor has increased stability and an interfacial nanoarchitecture suitable for the immobilization of a broad number of recognition elements without loss of their biological activity.