Graphene Production via Hydrodynamic Cavitation Reactor

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for producing graphene materials are inefficient due to high chemical usage, long processing times, energy intensity, and environmental concerns, resulting in partially oxidized and less conductive graphene sheets with significant material loss and environmental impact.

Innovation Solution

A hydrodynamic cavitation process that disperses graphitic materials in a liquid medium and subjects them to shockwaves generated by collapsing micro-bubbles, allowing for rapid exfoliation and separation of graphene sheets in a single step, reducing chemical consumption and environmental impact while producing more pristine and conductive graphene.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If chemical intercalation and oxidation methods are used to produce graphene, then graphene sheets can be obtained, but the process requires large quantities of chemicals and long processing times

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces chemical intercalation and oxidation processes with a mechanical exfoliation method using ultrasonic waves. Graphite is dispersed in a liquid medium and subjected to ultrasonic treatment, which mechanically separates the graphene layers without requiring chemical reagents. This substitution eliminates the need for chemical intercalation and oxidation steps, dramatically reducing both chemical usage and processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a liquid medium (water or alcohol) as a hydraulic environment to facilitate the exfoliation process. The liquid medium allows ultrasonic waves to propagate effectively and provides a medium for the mechanical separation of graphene layers. This hydraulic approach enables efficient energy transfer and enhances the exfoliation efficiency compared to dry mechanical methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

2Productivity

If thermal shock exposure is used to exfoliate graphite, then graphene sheets can be separated, but the process is highly energy intensive requiring temperatures of 800-1050°C

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the thermal shock method with a mechanical ultrasonic exfoliation process. Instead of heating graphite to 800-1050°C to achieve exfoliation, the patent uses ultrasonic waves in a liquid medium to mechanically separate the layers at ambient or mild temperatures. This mechanical substitution eliminates the high energy input required for thermal processing while achieving effective graphene separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operating parameters from high temperature (800-1050°C) to ambient or mild temperatures by switching from thermal to mechanical exfoliation. This parameter change dramatically reduces energy consumption while maintaining effective graphene separation through the use of ultrasonic mechanical energy in a liquid medium.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If multiple expansion and separation procedures are used, then graphene sheets can be produced, but the process complexity increases with three distinct procedures

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the intercalation, oxidation, and separation steps into a single mechanical exfoliation process. Instead of performing chemical intercalation followed by oxidation and then separation, the patent uses ultrasonic waves in a liquid medium to simultaneously achieve layer separation and dispersion. This consolidation reduces the number of distinct procedures from three to one, simplifying the overall process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The ultrasonic exfoliation method serves multiple functions simultaneously: it acts as the exfoliation mechanism, the separation method, and the dispersion technique. A single ultrasonic treatment step accomplishes what previously required multiple specialized procedures, providing a universal approach that eliminates the need for separate chemical treatment and mechanical separation steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If chemical intercalation and oxidation are performed, then expanded graphite can be obtained, but significant material loss occurs with 20-50% weight loss of graphite

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces chemical intercalation and oxidation with mechanical ultrasonic exfoliation. This mechanical approach physically separates the graphene layers without chemically consuming the graphite material. As a result, the graphite is converted to graphene with minimal material loss, in contrast to the 20-50% weight loss typical of chemical methods where graphite is consumed in oxidation reactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The ultrasonic exfoliation process allows the graphite material to self-exfoliate into graphene layers through mechanical energy input, without requiring chemical reagents that would consume or transform the carbon structure. The graphite essentially serves itself by converting to graphene through physical separation, preserving the majority of the original material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method significantly shortens production time, increases graphene yield, reduces material loss, and produces higher-quality, more conductive graphene sheets with reduced environmental impact, making it a scalable and cost-effective process.

Implementation Method 1

introducing the graphite suspension into a controlled cavitation reactor that generates and collapses cavitation or bubbles in the liquid medium to produce shock waves

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCavitation: Cavitation

Implementation Method 2

the graphite suspension is exposed to shockwaves produced by cavitation and collapse of micro-bubbles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock wave: Shock Wave

Data Source

PatentUS9315388B2Production of graphene materials in a cavitating fluid
Publication Date: 2016.04.19
  • US9315388B2 patent drawing
  • US9315388B2 patent drawing
  • US9315388B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention provides a method of producing a graphene material from a starting graphitic material. In an embodiment, the method comprises: (a) dispersing the starting graphitic material in a liquid medium to form a graphite suspension; and (b) introducing the graphite suspension into a hydrodynamic cavitation reactor that generates and collapses cavitation or bubbles in the liquid medium to exfoliate and separate graphene planes from the starting graphitic material for producing the graphene material. The process is fast (minutes as opposed to hours or days of conventional processes), environmentally benign, and highly scalable. The reactor can concurrently perform the functions of graphene production, chemical functionalization, dispersion, and mixing with a polymer to make a composite.