Graphene Production via Carbon Monoxide Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for producing graphene are either time-consuming and expensive for large-scale production or result in graphene with significant oxide groups and defects, affecting its electronic, optical, and mechanical properties.

Innovation Solution

A process involving the expansion of graphite intercalated with oxygen-containing groups followed by reduction with carbon monoxide to produce reduced expanded graphite with minimal oxygen content, which is then exfoliated to form high-quality reduced graphene.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If bottom up methods such as CVD are used for graphene production, then high quality single-layer or few-layer graphene can be obtained, but the production is time consuming and expensive with only small volumes produced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegraphene qualityVSAvoidproduction volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention transitions from producing single-layer or few-layer graphene to producing multi-layer graphene arrays, effectively changing the dimensional aspect of the product. This allows scaling up production volume while maintaining quality through the stacked multi-layer structure that can be produced in larger quantities per unit area

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes key process parameters including using expandable graphite as starting material, applying controlled expansion conditions, and optimizing reduction parameters to achieve high-quality graphene at scale. The multi-layer structure parameter enables both high volume and high quality simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If top down methods such as chemical oxidation are used for graphene production, then large quantities of graphene can be produced, but the graphene contains significant proportion of oxide groups and defects which have detrimental effects on electronic, optical and mechanical properties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction volumeVSAvoidgraphene quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses controlled oxidation during the expansion process, then converts the harmful oxide groups back into beneficial structures through reduction with carbon monoxide. This transforms the detrimental oxide-containing intermediate into high-quality reduced graphene with restored electronic, optical and mechanical properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces carbon monoxide as an intermediary reducing agent that selectively removes oxide groups from the expanded graphite structure. This intermediary substance enables the conversion of oxidized graphite into high-quality reduced graphene while maintaining production scalability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If expandable graphite is heated for expansion followed by reduction with carbon monoxide, then high quality reduced expanded graphite with minimal oxide content can be produced, but the process requires multiple steps and controlled conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoxide content reductionVSAvoidprocess steps
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the expansion and reduction steps into an integrated process flow where expandable graphite is heated for expansion and then immediately treated with carbon monoxide for reduction in a coordinated sequence. This merging approach maintains simplicity while achieving minimal oxide content through the combined effects of both steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process enables the production of high-quality graphene with reduced defects and oxide content, suitable for large-scale commercial viability and improved electronic, thermal, and mechanical properties.

Implementation Method 1

contacting the expanded graphite with carbon monoxide to reduce at least a portion of the oxygen containing groups thereby forming reduced expanded graphite

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reduction: Reduction

Implementation Method 2

heating the expandable graphite under conditions sufficient to cause expansion of the expandable graphite thereby forming expanded graphite

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Data Source

PatentEP3148934B1Graphene production process
Publication Date: 2023.04.12 ROYAL MELBOURNE INST OF TECH
  • EP3148934B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3148934B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3148934B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

A process for the preparation of reduced graphene comprising the steps of: providing an expandable graphite intercalated with oxygen containing groups; heating the expandable graphite under conditions sufficient to cause expansion of the expandable graphite and formation of an expanded graphite comprising oxygen containing groups; and contacting the expanded graphite with carbon monoxide to reduce at least a portion of the oxygen containing groups and form a reduced expanded graphite comprising an array of reduced graphene. The process of the invention enables large volumes of high quality graphene to be produced.