Graphene-Coated Polymer Powder for Conductive, Flowable Composites

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing polymer powders lack sufficient electrical conductivity, leading to issues such as static charge buildup, reduced flowability, and brittle composites when high concentrations of conductive fillers are used, limiting their applications in manufacturing techniques like additive manufacturing and molding.

Innovation Solution

A composite powder material comprising particulate polymers coated with graphene at concentrations of 0.03-1.5% by weight, enhancing electrical conductivity and mechanical strength while maintaining processability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If high concentrations of conductive fillers (metal, carbon black) are added to polymer powder to improve electrical conductivity, then electrical conductivity is improved, but the composite becomes brittle and difficult to process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical conductivityVSAvoidmechanical strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by coating only the surface of polymer particles with graphene rather than mixing graphene uniformly throughout the bulk material. This surface coating approach provides sufficient electrical conductivity at the particle level while maintaining the bulk polymer's mechanical properties and processability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite structure where graphene-coated polymer particles form a conductive network when packed together. The graphene layers on particle surfaces create conductive pathways through contact between particles, achieving bulk conductivity without compromising the polymer matrix integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If high concentrations of conductive fillers are added to improve electrical conductivity, then electrical conductivity is improved, but flowability decreases due to static charge buildup and dusting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical conductivityVSAvoidflowability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

By applying graphene coating only to the particle surface rather than bulk mixing, the patent reduces overall filler content while achieving conductivity. This lower filler concentration minimizes static charge accumulation and maintains better powder flow characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the concentration parameter of conductive filler from high bulk loading (typically 20-40 wt%) to low surface coating (0.1-5 wt% graphene), fundamentally altering the system's electrical and rheological properties to achieve both conductivity and flowability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If carbon-based fillers are added at high inclusion levels to improve electrical conductivity, then electrical conductivity is improved, but processability is limited and embrittlement occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical conductivityVSAvoidprocessability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The surface coating methodology concentrates graphene at particle interfaces where it is needed for conductivity, while leaving the bulk polymer matrix unchanged and easily processable. This localized approach eliminates the embrittlement and processing difficulties associated with high bulk filler loading.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a hierarchical composite structure with graphene-coated particles forming a conductive network in the bulk polymer. This structure achieves conductivity through particle-particle contact rather than requiring high filler content, maintaining excellent processability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The coated polymer powders exhibit improved electrical conductivity, reduced static charge, and enhanced mechanical properties, enabling effective use in manufacturing techniques like SLS printing, rotational molding, and injection molding.

Implementation Method 1

the polymer-graphene composite material can exhibit electrical conductivity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 2

due to the low conductivity of the powder static charges can build up on the powder surface while handling the powder

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic discharge: Electrostatic Discharge

Data Source

PatentUS20260061697A1Graphene Coated Polymer Particulate Powder
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 GRAPHMATECH AB
  • US20260061697A1 patent drawing
  • US20260061697A1 patent drawing
  • US20260061697A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to conducting polymer powder. In particular, it relates to composite powder material including particulate polymer and graphene, wherein the particulate polymer is coated with graphene, and wherein the graphene concentration is 0.03-1.5% in weight per weight of the particulate polymer. The polymer is selected from the group consisting of polyamide, thermoplastic fluoropolymer, polyethylene, and polyurethane. The polyamide is selected from the group consisting of PA6, PA11, PA12, PA66.