Graphene Production via Detonation Synthesis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for producing graphene suffer from low yield, environmental concerns, and structural defects, making them unsuitable for large-scale, eco-friendly production.

Innovation Solution

A one-step process involving the controlled detonation of a carbon-containing material with an oxidizing agent at high temperatures to produce graphene particles, eliminating the need for catalytic materials and resulting in pristine graphene nanosheets.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If chemical exfoliation of graphite to graphite oxide and then to GO is used, then yield is improved, but electrical conductivity deteriorates due to presence of epoxide, carboxyl, and hydroxyl groups

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveyieldVSAvoidelectrical conductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the fundamental parameters of the synthesis process by using chemical vapor deposition at controlled temperatures (25-1000°C) with carbon-containing gases, rather than chemical exfoliation. This parameter change produces graphene with high electrical conductivity while maintaining scalable yield through continuous production methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention avoids using strong oxidants entirely, which is the core issue with the Hummer's method. By using CVD with carbon-containing gases in controlled atmospheres, the process eliminates the need for oxidizing agents that create functional groups compromising electrical conductivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #38Strong oxidants (Accelerated oxidation)

2Reliability

If reduction of GO to graphene is performed using insalubrious chemical reductants or high temperature heating, then graphene structure is recovered, but environmental safety deteriorates and structural defects remain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegraphene structureVSAvoidenvironmental safety
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses self-assembled graphene growth through CVD where carbon atoms naturally arrange into graphene structures on catalyst substrates or through flame synthesis, eliminating the need for external reductants. This self-organizing process produces high-quality graphene without environmental hazards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces chemical reduction mechanisms with physical processes - either controlled thermal decomposition in CVD or flame-based synthesis - to produce graphene directly without chemical reductants, thereby eliminating environmental safety concerns associated with hydrazine and other harmful chemicals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If micromechanical cleavage of HOPG is used, then pristine graphene is obtained, but productivity deteriorates due to low yield

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepristine graphene qualityVSAvoidyield
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the production process into scalable stages - from single-layer CVD growth to multi-layer production, and from laboratory-scale to industrial roll-to-roll production. This segmentation enables maintaining pristine quality while dramatically increasing yield through systematic scaling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from two-dimensional mechanical exfoliation to three-dimensional gas-phase CVD processes, allowing volumetric production of graphene. This dimensional change enables scalable yield while maintaining material quality through controlled deposition processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Productivity

If CVD method is used for roll-to-roll production, then productivity is improved, but device complexity deteriorates due to process complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction scaleVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses universal CVD processes that can produce graphene on various substrates (metal foils, oxides, insulators) and in various forms (films, powders, coatings) using the same fundamental mechanism. This universality simplifies device design by eliminating the need for different processes for different products.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention implements continuous CVD processes and roll-to-roll production methods where graphene is deposited continuously on moving substrates, eliminating batch processing steps. This continuity maintains high productivity while reducing process complexity by eliminating repeated heating, cooling, and loading/unloading cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method achieves high-yield, eco-friendly production of graphene nanosheets with minimal structural defects, suitable for industrial-scale applications, and maintains the material's pristine nature.

Implementation Method 1

The mixture is detonated within the vessel. The heat produced by the detonation causes a temperature of at least 3000 K so as to generate graphene particles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDetonation: Detonation

Implementation Method 2

A mixture comprising a combustible carbon-containing material and an oxidizing agent for the carbon-containing material is provided within an enclosed vessel. The mixture is detonated within the vessel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectExothermic reaction: Exothermic Reaction

Data Source

PatentUS9440857B2Process for high-yield production of graphene via detonation of carbon-containing material
Publication Date: 2016.09.13 KANSAS STATE UNIV RES FOUND
  • US9440857B2 patent drawing
  • US9440857B2 patent drawing
  • US9440857B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of producing pristine graphene particles through a one-step, gas-phase, catalyst-free detonation of a mixture of one or more carbon-containing compounds hydrocarbon compounds and one or more oxidizing agents is provided. The detonation reaction occurs very quickly and at relatively high temperature, greater than 3000 K, to generate graphene nanosheets that can be recovered from the reaction vessel, such as in the form of an aerosol. The graphene nanosheets may be stacked in single, double, or triple layers, for example, and may have an average particle size of between about 35 to about 250 nm.