Graphene Growth on Flexible Copper Circuits at Low PECVD Temperature

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for growing graphene on copper ink and flexible substrates face challenges such as high growth temperatures that damage polymer substrates and require additional processes for transfer, leading to poor adhesion and scalability issues in industrial production.

Innovation Solution

A single-step plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) method that sinter and passivate Cu ink without active heating, optimizing the hydrogen-to-methane ratio and total pressure to achieve low-temperature graphene growth on flexible substrates, enabling direct graphene deposition on copper ink and electroplated Cu with improved electrical and structural properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If conventional plasma growth chamber temperatures are used, then graphene growth is achieved, but polymer substrates are damaged due to high temperature

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplasma growth chamber temperatureVSAvoidsubstrate integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by lowering the plasma growth chamber temperature from conventional high temperatures to a range of 50-150°C, enabling graphene synthesis on temperature-sensitive polymer substrates while maintaining the quality of graphene growth through optimized plasma parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamics by using a two-stage temperature control strategy: initial heating to 50-150°C for plasma treatment and graphene growth, followed by controlled cooling to room temperature, allowing the substrate to adapt to temperature changes without damage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of manufacture

If additional transfer processes are used for graphene deposition, then graphene can be formed on copper ink, but adhesion is poor and manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing process simplicityVSAvoidgraphene adhesion
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple processes into a single integrated PECVD step that simultaneously sinters copper ink particles, forms continuous conductive pathways, and deposits graphene layers directly in-situ, eliminating separate transfer operations and ensuring strong adhesion between graphene and copper

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses plasma as an intermediary that enables direct in-situ graphene deposition on copper ink without requiring transfer media or additional processing steps, with plasma providing both the sintering energy and carbon source for graphene formation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Power

If low plasma power is used, then polymer substrates are protected from damage, but graphene growth rate decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplasma powerVSAvoidgraphene growth rate
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes plasma power parameters to operate at low power levels (50-200 W) while maintaining effective graphene growth by adjusting plasma chemistry and residence time, achieving a balance between substrate protection and production efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent ensures continuous useful action by maintaining steady plasma conditions throughout the growth chamber with optimized gas flow rates and pressure, allowing low-power plasma to continuously generate reactive species that deposit graphene at a practical rate

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method allows for scalable and industrially compatible graphene growth on flexible substrates, reducing electrical resistivity by over 75% and enhancing the durability of Cu circuits, with graphene coverage suppressing copper oxide formation and improving the connectivity of Cu nanoparticles, suitable for flexible hybrid electronics and IoT applications.

Implementation Method 1

subjecting the polymer substrate to a plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) process and growing a graphene layer on the metal structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition: Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapour Deposition

Implementation Method 2

The method includes providing a polymer substrate including a metal structure... growing a graphene layer on the metal structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Data Source

PatentUS11823895B2Methods and devices for graphene formation on flexible substrates by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition
Publication Date: 2023.11.21 CALIFORNIA INST OF TECH
  • US11823895B2 patent drawing
  • US11823895B2 patent drawing
  • US11823895B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of forming graphene on a flexible substrate includes providing a polymer substrate including a metal structure and providing a carbon source and a carrier gas. The method also includes subjecting the polymer substrate to a plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) process and growing a graphene layer on the copper structure.