Graphene Foam LTCC Composites for Homogeneous Microstructure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge in developing graphene-ceramic composites lies in achieving homogeneous microstructure and predictable properties due to graphene agglomeration, anisotropic properties from 2D morphology, and the complexity of dispersion techniques, which hinder bulk-scale manufacturing and real-world applications.

Innovation Solution

The use of a 3D graphene foam as a filler material infiltrated with a sintered low-temperature co-fired ceramic matrix, allowing for superior microstructure control and uniform properties without the need for complex dispersion techniques, resulting in dense, high-strength composites with enhanced electrical and thermal conductivities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If 2D graphene flakes are used as filler material, then electrical and thermal conductivity can be improved, but homogeneous distribution is difficult to achieve due to agglomeration and anisotropic properties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical and thermal conductivityVSAvoidmicrostructure homogeneity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from 2D graphene flakes to 3D graphene foam architecture. This dimensional change eliminates the anisotropic alignment issues inherent in 2D flakes, providing isotropic electrical and thermal conductivity while enabling homogeneous distribution throughout the ceramic matrix without agglomeration problems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes the porous structure of graphene foam with controlled pore sizes to achieve homogeneous distribution in the ceramic matrix. The porous architecture allows for uniform infiltration of ceramic slurry and prevents agglomeration while maintaining high surface area for property enhancement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

2Manufacturing precision

If complex dispersion techniques are used to achieve homogeneous graphene distribution, then microstructure homogeneity can be improved, but processing complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemicrostructure homogeneityVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-fabricating the 3D graphene foam structure before ceramic infiltration. This pre-formed 3D architecture inherently provides homogeneous distribution without requiring complex dispersion techniques during ceramic processing, simplifying the overall manufacturing workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the problematic dispersion step from the processing sequence by using pre-formed 3D graphene foam. This eliminates the need for ball milling, sonication, and chemical functionalization that are required for 2D flakes, significantly reducing processing complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Manufacturing precision

If high temperature and pressure are applied for ceramic densification, then ceramic density can be improved, but structural integrity of graphene foam may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveceramic densityVSAvoidgraphene foam structural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by employing low-temperature co-fired ceramic (LTCC) processing conditions. This allows ceramic densification at temperatures that preserve the structural integrity of the 3D graphene foam, achieving both high ceramic density and maintained graphene architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the creation of dense graphene foam ceramic composites with exceptional mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties, suitable for structural applications, while preserving the 3D interconnected architecture of graphene foam, thus overcoming the limitations of 2D graphene-based composites.

Implementation Method 1

an open cell graphene foam (GrF) surrounded by and infiltrated with a sintered low temperature co-fired ceramic (LTCC) matrix

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapillary action: Capillary Action

Implementation Method 2

sintered low temperature co-fired ceramic (LTCC) matrix

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Data Source

PatentUS10961162B2Method to produce graphene foam reinforced low temperature co-fired ceramic (LTCC) composites
Publication Date: 2021.03.30 FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY
  • US10961162B2 patent drawing
  • US10961162B2 patent drawing
  • US10961162B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A graphene foam ceramic composite (GrF-CC) comprises an open cell graphene foam (GrF) surrounded by and infiltrated with a sintered low temperature co-fired ceramic (LTCC) matrix. The GrF-CC can be prepared by infiltrating an open cell GrF with an LTCC slurry, removing the solvent from the slurry with solidification to a ceramic-GrF green body, and sintering the ceramic-GrF green body to form the GrF-CC. Sintering by spark plasma sintering (SPS) allows an LTCC GrF-CC that has a density of at least 90%.