3D Porous Graphene Frameworks for Supercapacitor Energy Density

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional supercapacitors exhibit low energy and power densities, as well as limited cycling and capacitive capabilities, hindering their advancement in line with rapid progress in electronic devices due to the lack of new materials with high charge storage capacity.

Innovation Solution

The development of supercapacitors featuring a three-dimensional porous reduced graphene oxide framework as electrodes, with a specific surface area of 450 m2/g to 3,000 m2/g, and a composite material comprising capacitive or pseudo-capacitive materials, such as silicon or sulfur, to enhance power density and cycle lifetime.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If conventional supercapacitor materials are used, then device simplicity is maintained, but energy density and power density remain low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharge storage capacityVSAvoidmaterial structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs reduced graphene oxide (rGO) with a porous three-dimensional framework structure. This porous architecture provides high surface area for charge storage while maintaining structural integrity. The pores facilitate electrolyte penetration and ion transport, directly addressing the low energy density issue without requiring overly complex material compositions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates composite structures by combining reduced graphene oxide with conductive additives and binders to form electrode materials. This composite approach enhances both the charge storage capacity and electrical conductivity simultaneously, resolving the contradiction between energy density improvement and material complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Quantity of substance

If electrode surface area is increased to improve charge storage, then energy density improves, but power density decreases due to slower ion transport

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharge storage capacityVSAvoidpower density
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a hierarchical porous structure where different pore sizes are distributed throughout the electrode. Micro-pores provide high surface area for charge storage, while meso-pores and macro-pores facilitate rapid ion transport. This local differentiation of pore qualities allows simultaneous optimization of both energy density and power density

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from two-dimensional graphene sheets to three-dimensional porous frameworks. This dimensional enhancement provides both increased surface area for charge storage and interconnected pathways for rapid ion diffusion, effectively resolving the trade-off between energy density and power density

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Duration of action of stationary object

If cycling duration is extended to improve cycle life, then reliability improves, but capacitive capability degrades over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecycle lifeVSAvoidcapacitive capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates robust binder materials and conductive additives that provide structural cushioning and electrical continuity throughout the electrode. These components compensate for mechanical stress and chemical degradation during cycling, maintaining capacitive capability over extended cycle life. The rGO framework itself provides structural resilience against degradation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The proposed solution significantly improves power density and cycle lifetime of supercapacitors, enabling their application in high-performance energy storage devices for applications like hybrid electric vehicles and regenerative braking.

Implementation Method 1

an electrochemical system comprising a first electrode, a second electrode, wherein at least one of the first electrode and the second electrode comprises a three dimensional porous reduced graphene oxide framework

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic double-layer capacitance: Capacitance

Implementation Method 2

a composite material comprising a capacitive or pseudo-capacitive material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPseudo-capacitance: Capacitance

Data Source

PatentUS11348740B2Graphene frameworks for supercapacitors
Publication Date: 2022.05.31 RGT UNIV OF CALIFORNIA
  • US11348740B2 patent drawing
  • US11348740B2 patent drawing
  • US11348740B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides supercapacitors that may avoid shortcomings of current energy storage technology. Provided herein are materials and fabrication processes of such supercapacitors. In some embodiments, an electrochemical system comprising a first electrode, a second electrode, wherein at least one of the first electrode and the second electrode comprises a three dimensional porous reduced graphene oxide framework.