Graphene Preparation via Graphite Grinding in Ionic Liquids

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current chemical exfoliation methods for producing graphene result in poor-quality graphene due to surface defects, high costs, toxicity, and environmental concerns, with challenges in achieving high yields and large-scale production while maintaining the material's unique properties.

Innovation Solution

A process involving the mixing and grinding of natural graphite with ionic liquids, eliminating the need for sonication and reducing impurities, which allows for the production of high-quality graphene nanosheets or nanodots with low oxygen content and minimal defects, suitable for large-scale production.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If chemical oxidation of graphite is used to produce graphene oxide sheets, then exfoliation into individual sheets is achieved, but surface defects and oxygen-containing groups are introduced that degrade graphene quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexfoliation processVSAvoidgraphene quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes oxygen-containing groups and surface defects from graphene oxide sheets through a reduction process, obtaining clean graphene sheets that retain high quality while maintaining the ease of chemical exfoliation approach

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The method discards the harmful oxygen-containing groups and impurities introduced during oxidation, then recovers the high-quality graphene sheets by removing these unwanted components through reduction and washing steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

2Manufacturing precision

If chemical reduction is applied to restore graphene properties, then conductivity is improved, but graphene sheets coalesce and restack due to loss of electrostatic repulsion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegraphene conductivityVSAvoidgraphene sheet separation
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary chemical reduction to restore graphene conductivity before the sheets can coalesce, then immediately introduces a dispersant to prevent restacking, maintaining both conductivity and sheet separation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A dispersant is introduced as an intermediary substance that mediates between the reduced graphene sheets, preventing them from coalescing while allowing the restoration of graphene properties through reduction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If dispersants or surfactants are used to prevent graphene aggregation, then sheet separation is maintained, but the graphene quality deteriorates due to coating and weak repulsions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegraphene sheet separationVSAvoidgraphene quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the surface charge parameter of graphene sheets by controlling the reduction process and pH conditions, creating strong electrostatic repulsion between sheets without requiring external dispersant coatings, thus maintaining both separation and quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Manufacturing precision

If multiple chemical processing steps are used to produce graphene, then graphene properties are restored, but production time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegraphene property restorationVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple chemical processing steps into an integrated one-pot procedure where oxidation, reduction, and purification occur in sequence within a single reaction system, dramatically reducing production time while maintaining graphene quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The method establishes continuous useful action by performing reduction and purification steps in immediate succession without intermediate drying or isolation steps, maintaining the graphene sheets in a controlled environment throughout the process to prevent aggregation and maintain quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

5Manufacturing precision

If thermal reduction at high temperature is used to remove oxide defects, then graphene quality is improved, but the process becomes unsuitable for many applications requiring lower temperatures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegraphene purityVSAvoidapplication compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the temperature parameter of the reduction process from high-temperature thermal reduction to mild chemical reduction at lower temperatures, achieving comparable graphene purity while making the process compatible with temperature-sensitive applications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method produces high-quality graphene with increased yields and reduced impurities, making it more cost-effective and environmentally friendly, while maintaining the material's unique properties, and is suitable for large-scale commercial production.

Implementation Method 1

A process involving the mixing and grinding of natural graphite with ionic liquids

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 2

grinding of natural graphite with ionic liquids

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion: Abrasion

Implementation Method 3

produces high-quality graphene with increased yields and reduced impurities

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentEP2681155B1Process for the preparation of graphene
Publication Date: 2022.06.29 VERSARIEN PLC
  • EP2681155B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2681155B1 patent drawingFigure 2(a)~2(d)
  • EP2681155B1 patent drawingFigure 3(a)~3(e)

AI summary

The present invention provides a process for the preparation of graphene or graphene-like fragments of another layered structure, said process comprising the step of mixing and grinding graphite or said other layered structure with at least one ionic liquid. The invention also provides the use of grinding in ionic liquids in such a process and products formed or formable by such methods.