Graphene Conductive Ink Compression for Scalable High Conductivity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for preparing graphene-based conductive inks are either not scalable or result in materials with insufficient electrical conductivity, making them unsuitable for advanced manufacturing applications.

Innovation Solution

A two-step exfoliation process using a combination of an exfoliating agent and a binder, where the ink is applied to a substrate and then compressed to further reduce thickness, enhancing conductivity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If chemical exfoliation of graphite is used to produce graphene at industrial scale, then scalability is improved, but electrical conductivity deteriorates due to reduced graphene quality and increased thickness

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovescalabilityVSAvoidelectrical conductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention divides the exfoliation process into two distinct steps: first chemical exfoliation to separate graphite layers, then mechanical compression to further reduce thickness. This segmentation allows each step to optimize for its specific function, achieving both scalability and high conductivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the physical state and density parameters by applying mechanical compression (e.g., 100-1000 MPa) to the chemically exfoliated graphene material. This parameter change reduces the interlayer spacing and thickness, thereby improving electrical conductivity while maintaining the scalability of the chemical exfoliation process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If adhesive tape method is used to exfoliate graphite, then graphene quality is improved with reduced thickness, but scalability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegraphene qualityVSAvoidscalability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses chemical exfoliation agents as intermediaries to achieve layer separation, replacing the manual adhesive tape method. This allows the exfoliation process to be performed on bulk graphite materials at industrial scale while still producing high-quality graphene with controlled thickness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the manual mechanical exfoliation (adhesive tape) with a chemical exfoliation process using intercalating agents, enabling automated and scalable production while maintaining graphene quality through subsequent compression steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If chemical reduction of graphene oxide is used, then production scalability is improved, but electrical conductivity deteriorates due to insufficient conductivity achievement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction scalabilityVSAvoidelectrical conductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention continues the exfoliation action beyond the initial chemical step by applying mechanical compression to further reduce thickness. This continuous improvement of the exfoliation process ensures high electrical conductivity is achieved while maintaining the scalability of chemical production methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method produces highly conductive coatings with improved electrical properties suitable for advanced manufacturing, achieving conductivities comparable to existing methods while being scalable.

Implementation Method 1

interacting with said layers by the means of non-covalent interactions, such as hydrogen bonding, anion-π interactions, cation-π interactions or hydrophobic interactions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNon-covalent interactions: Van der Waals Force

Implementation Method 2

the ink is applied to a substrate and then compressed to further reduce thickness, enhancing conductivity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Data Source

PatentUS20250313713A1Method for the production of a conductive graphene-based ink and product thereof
Publication Date: 2025.10.09 ASSOC CENT DE INVESTIGACION COOP & NANOCIENCIAS CIC NANOGUNE
  • US20250313713A1 patent drawing
  • US20250313713A1 patent drawing
  • US20250313713A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method for the preparation of a graphene-based conductive ink for additive manufacturing, said method being based on the exfoliation of graphite. The invention also relates to a graphene-based conductive ink for additive manufacturing, to a method for the preparation of a substrate coated with said conductive ink and to the resulting coated substrate.