Graphene-Encapsulated Lithium Metal Particles for Dendrite Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Lithium metal batteries face safety issues due to dendrite formation and penetration, leading to internal shorting and explosion, while lithium-ion batteries have limitations in energy density and cost-effectiveness for electric vehicle applications.

Innovation Solution

A method of producing graphene-encapsulated lithium metal particles by peeling off graphene sheets from graphitic material and transferring them onto polymer-coated particles, followed by impregnation with lithium metal, creating a stable and conductive shell that prevents dendrite growth.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If lithium metal is used as the anode to achieve high energy density, then the energy density is significantly higher than lithium ion batteries, but dendrites form and penetrate through the separator causing internal shorting and explosion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy densityVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A flexible polymer coating layer is applied to the lithium metal anode particles. This thin film layer physically constrains dendrite growth while maintaining lithium ion conductivity, allowing the battery to achieve high energy density from lithium metal without the safety risks of dendrite penetration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The anode is constructed as a composite material system combining lithium metal particles with a polymer coating matrix. This composite structure provides both the high capacity of lithium metal (3,861 mAh/g) and the safety benefits of the polymer matrix that prevents dendrite formation and electrolyte leakage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If graphite is used as the anode to eliminate dendrites, then safety is improved, but energy density is significantly reduced compared to lithium metal batteries

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidenergy density
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using graphite as the anode material (traditional approach), the invention inverts the approach by using lithium metal particles as the anode active material but constraining them within a polymer matrix. This reversal allows achieving both high energy density and safety simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Reliability

If a rigid solid protective layer is used to stop dendrite penetration, then safety is improved, but ion conductivity is excessively low and manufacturing is difficult and expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the key parameter of the protective layer from rigid/ceramic to flexible/polymer. This parameter change maintains the safety function of preventing dendrite penetration while dramatically improving lithium ion conductivity and simplifying manufacturing processes to be compatible with current lithium battery production equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If a solid electrolyte is used to resist dendrite penetration, then safety is improved, but lithium-ion conductivity is excessively low at room temperature

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidion conductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the electrolyte state from solid to a polymer-coated structure that maintains flexibility. This allows the system to achieve both dendrite resistance and high lithium ion conductivity at room temperature, overcoming the fundamental limitation of solid electrolytes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method results in lithium metal particles with enhanced electrical and thermal conductivity, improved safety, and increased energy density, addressing the limitations of current lithium batteries for electric vehicle applications.

Implementation Method 1

mixing multiple particles of a graphitic material, multiple polymer-coated solid particles of a lithium-attracting seed material, and optional ball-milling media to form a mixture in an impacting chamber of an energy impacting apparatus... operating the energy impacting apparatus with a frequency and an intensity for a length of time sufficient for peeling off graphene sheets from the particles of graphitic material and transferring the peeled graphene sheets to surfaces of the polymer-coated particles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical impact: Impact Force

Implementation Method 2

the resulting empty space between the embracing graphene sheets and the metal particle is then filled with lithium metal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Data Source

PatentUS10930924B2Chemical-free production of surface-stabilized lithium metal particles, electrodes and lithium battery containing same
Publication Date: 2021.02.23 HONEYCOMB BATTERY CO
  • US10930924B2 patent drawing
  • US10930924B2 patent drawing
  • US10930924B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a simple, fast, scalable, and environmentally benign method of producing graphene-stabilized lithium metal particles, comprising: a) mixing particles of a graphitic material, polymer-coated particles of a lithium-attracting seed material, and optional ball-milling media to form a mixture in an impacting chamber of an energy impacting apparatus; b) operating the apparatus with a frequency and an intensity for a length of time sufficient for peeling off graphene sheets from particles of graphitic material and transferring the peeled graphene sheets to surfaces of the polymer-coated particles and fully encapsulate the particles to produce graphene-encapsulated polymer-coated solid particles; c) recovering the graphene-encapsulated polymer-coated solid particles from the impacting chamber and removing the polymer from the particles to produce graphene balls, wherein the graphene ball has a graphene shell, a lithium-attracting seed material particle and a hollow space; and d) impregnating the graphene balls with lithium metal.