Graphene Membrane Plasma Etching Pore Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for fabricating graphene membranes with nanopores face challenges in controlling pore size and porosity, leading to suboptimal performance in gas separation applications.

Innovation Solution

A method involving exposure of a non-porous 2D film to a plasma comprising reactive gases, such as oxygen and argon, to create nanopores with controlled size distribution and porosity, utilizing inorganic oxides or nitrides as deposited components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If graphene is made porous through artificial pore fabrication (etching), then gas permeability is improved, but pore size control and porosity uniformity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas permeabilityVSAvoidpore size control
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer (such as a sacrificial layer or template) that mediates the pore formation process. This intermediary structure enables controlled pore fabrication by serving as a precursor that defines pore locations and sizes before being removed or transformed, thereby achieving both high permeability and precise pore size control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes in the etching process, such as controlling etch depth, etch rate, plasma power, gas flow rates, and treatment time, to precisely regulate pore size and distribution. By optimizing these parameters, the method achieves narrow pore size distribution while maintaining high gas permeability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If pore size is reduced to increase selectivity, then gas separation selectivity is improved, but gas flow rate (permeance) deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation selectivityVSAvoidgas flow rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating uniform nanopores with precise size control across the membrane surface. This uniformity ensures that each pore contributes optimally to both selectivity and permeance, avoiding the trade-off that occurs with irregular pore distributions where some pores may be too small (reducing flow) or too large (reducing selectivity)

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent may employ composite structures combining graphene with other materials or multi-layer configurations that enhance both selectivity and permeance. The composite approach allows optimization of pore characteristics while maintaining structural integrity and gas transport properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Manufacturing precision

If conventional etching methods are used for pore fabrication, then pore formation is achieved, but scalability and cost-effectiveness deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepore fabricationVSAvoidscalability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical drilling or focused ion beam methods with plasma-based or chemical etching processes. These alternative methods enable batch processing and scaling to larger membrane areas while maintaining precise pore size control, thereby improving both manufacturability and cost-effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent develops a universal pore fabrication method that can be applied to various graphene membrane configurations and scales. The method uses commonly available materials and equipment, making it adaptable from laboratory-scale to industrial-scale production without requiring specialized facilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method achieves graphene membranes with high porosity and narrow pore size distribution, enhancing gas separation efficiency by balancing permeance and selectivity.

Implementation Method 1

exposing said non-porous 2D film to a plasma comprising reactive gases, such as oxygen and argon, to create nanopores

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasma etching: Plasma

Implementation Method 2

wherein said plasma comprises components suitable to deposit an inorganic oxide or inorganic nitride on said 2D film

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical vapor deposition: Physical Vapour Deposition

Data Source

PatentEP4570363A1Method for treating a graphene membrane and membrane obtained by the method
Publication Date: 2025.06.18 UNIV DE FRIBOURG
  • EP4570363A1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1E
  • EP4570363A1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2E
  • EP4570363A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention concerns a method for producing a nanoporous 2D film, for example a graphene membrane. The method comprises exposing the non-porous 2D film to a reactive plasma and etching the 2D film so as to provide said nanoporous 2D film. In an embodiment, the method is a two-step method, comprising the initial deposition, by sputtering, of a protective layer comprising an inorganic oxide or nitride, before etching the 2D film. The nanoporous 2D films are useful for gas-separation.