Graphene Oxide Reduction in High Boiling Point Solvents

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for reducing graphene oxide to graphene, such as using hydrazine or thermal deoxygenation, face challenges like agglomeration, hazardous chemical handling, and high temperature requirements, making them commercially unattractive and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

Dispersing graphene oxide in water and adding a high boiling point solvent like n-methylpyrrolidone or ethylene glycol, followed by heating to 200°C under controlled conditions to minimize clumping and achieve dispersible graphene sheets.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If thermal deoxygenation is used to reduce graphene oxide, then graphene sheets can be produced, but temperatures in excess of 1000°C are required which makes the process cumbersome and slow

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovetemperatureVSAvoidproduction speed
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the temperature parameter from extreme high temperatures (>1000°C) to moderate temperatures (20-100°C) by introducing chemical reducing agents and alternative processing conditions, thereby maintaining production feasibility while dramatically improving productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the thermal energy-based reduction mechanism with chemical reduction mechanisms using agents like hydrazine, ascorbic acid, or sodium borohydride, substituting extreme heat with chemical reactions that occur at much lower temperatures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Temperature

If thermal deoxygenation is used to reduce graphene oxide, then graphene sheets can be produced, but the process requires an inert gas atmosphere such as Argon which increases complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovetemperatureVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the requirement for inert gas atmosphere from the reduction process by using chemical reducing agents that function effectively in ambient conditions, thereby simplifying the overall process complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The chemical reducing agents used in the patent perform multiple functions: they reduce graphene oxide, control pH conditions, and prevent unwanted side reactions, making the system self-sufficient without requiring external inert gas protection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If hydrazine is used to deoxygenate graphene oxide, then reduction can occur, but hydrazine is hazardous and explosive requiring special handling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereduction efficiencyVSAvoidtoxicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces hazardous hydrazine with safer, biodegradable reducing agents like ascorbic acid and sodium borohydride that are less toxic, environmentally friendly, and do not require special handling infrastructure, effectively substituting dangerous chemicals with benign alternatives

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the harmful properties of traditional reducing agents into beneficial characteristics by selecting agents that are safe, non-toxic, and environmentally compatible, turning a previously harmful process into a safe and sustainable one

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

4Productivity

If hydrazine is used to reduce graphene oxide, then deoxygenation occurs, but careful control of pH and hydrazine concentration is required which makes the method commercially unattractive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereduction efficiencyVSAvoidmanufacturing ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the pH range and reducing agent concentration to achieve effective reduction under broader, more tolerant conditions, reducing the need for precise parameter control and making the manufacturing process more robust and commercially viable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

5Productivity

If graphene oxide is reduced to graphene, then deoxygenation occurs, but graphene sheets tend to agglomerate and clump which reduces uniform dispersibility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereduction efficiencyVSAvoiddispersibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces pH control and specific reducing agents as intermediaries that prevent direct contact and aggregation of graphene sheets during reduction, maintaining uniform dispersibility while achieving complete deoxygenation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different local conditions (pH control, reducing agent concentration gradients) during the reduction process to prevent agglomeration in specific regions, ensuring uniform dispersibility throughout the entire graphene suspension

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method effectively produces dispersible graphene sheets without hazardous chemicals and at lower temperatures, enhancing the commercial viability and uniformity of the product for applications like transparent conductors and composite materials.

Implementation Method 1

adding a solvent to the dispersion to form a solution

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolvation: Solvation

Implementation Method 2

controlling a temperature of the solution to form dispersible graphene

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal reduction: Reduction

Data Source

PatentUS8147791B2Reduction of graphene oxide to graphene in high boiling point solvents
Publication Date: 2012.04.03 NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP
  • US8147791B2 patent drawing
  • US8147791B2 patent drawing
  • US8147791B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of creating graphene comprising the steps of dispersing graphene oxide into water to form a dispersion. Where the method further comprises adding a solvent to the dispersion to form a solution, and controlling a temperature of the solution to form graphene.