Graphene Sheet Production via Dry Rubbing Delamination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for obtaining sheets of graphene, boron nitride, molybdenum disulfide, or tungsten disulfide often require solvents and complex processes, making them costly and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

A method involving rubbing powder of these materials between two substrates under ambient conditions to form sheets or coatings without using solvents, reducing production costs and time, and enabling the creation of flexible electronic devices and transparent electrodes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If solvent-based delamination methods are used to obtain graphene sheets, then graphene layers can be separated, but the process becomes costly and complex requiring additional equipment and chemical reagents

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegraphene layer separationVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and eliminates the solvent step from the traditional delamination process. By directly rubbing graphite powder between two substrates, the method obtains graphene sheets without requiring solvent immersion or ultrasonic treatment, thus simplifying the process while maintaining effective layer separation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the chemical-mechanical system (solvent + ultrasonic vibration) with a purely mechanical system (direct rubbing). The mechanical friction and pressure applied during rubbing between substrates are sufficient to delaminate graphene layers without needing chemical solvents or complex ultrasonic equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If mechanical ablation of pencil leads is used to obtain graphene sheets, then layers can be separated, but the sheets obtained have small size (mean size of 2 μm) and require solvent treatment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayer separationVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The invention performs preliminary action by directly placing graphite powder between substrates before any separation process. The rubbing action itself simultaneously achieves both delamination and deposition of graphene sheets onto substrates, eliminating subsequent solvent treatment and sonication steps required in traditional methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention merges the delamination and deposition steps into a single rubbing operation. While traditional methods separate these steps (first delaminate in solvent, then deposit), this method combines both functions into one mechanical rubbing process between substrates, reducing production time and eliminating solvent usage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If graphite powder is sonicated with acacia gum to obtain few-layer graphene sheets, then sheets can be obtained, but the process requires solvents and additional materials

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefew-layer sheet formationVSAvoidmanufacturing simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and removes the acacia gum binder and solvent components from the sonication process. By using direct mechanical rubbing of graphite powder between substrates, the method achieves few-layer graphene formation without requiring any organic binders or solvent media, simplifying the manufacturing process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention enables the graphite powder to serve itself as both the source material and the lubricant during rubbing. The natural layered structure of graphite allows easy delamination through friction alone, without needing external lubricants or binders like acacia gum, making the process self-sufficient and simpler

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of manufacture

If multilayer graphenes are laminated directly on surfaces to obtain coating, then coating can be applied, but the multilayer graphenes consist of aggregation of many layers with thickness ranging from 0.34 to 10 nm

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoating applicationVSAvoidlayer thickness control
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies local quality by controlling the rubbing pressure and duration to achieve different layer thicknesses in different areas or on different substrates. By adjusting local rubbing parameters, one can obtain monolayer, few-layer, or multilayer graphene coatings precisely where needed, rather than uniform thick aggregates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses parameter changes (rubbing pressure, number of rubbing cycles, substrate material) to precisely control the number of graphene layers deposited. By varying these parameters, the method achieves precise thickness control from single layers to few layers, overcoming the uncontrolled aggregation (0.34-10 nm) in traditional lamination methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method effectively produces sheets with monoatomic or monomolecular thickness, reducing production costs and time, and allows for the development of applications such as flexible electronic devices and transparent electrodes without the need for solvents or complex equipment.

Implementation Method 1

A method involving rubbing powder of these materials between two substrates under ambient conditions to form sheets or coatings

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS10968104B2Method for producing sheets of graphene
Publication Date: 2021.04.06 UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA
  • US10968104B2 patent drawing
  • US10968104B2 patent drawing
  • US10968104B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for obtaining sheets of graphene, hexagonal boron nitride, molybdenum disulfide, tungsten disulfide or mixtures thereof from the powder of said materials. Said sheets consist of a set of strips, wherein said strips consist of between one and five layers. Said layers are layers of graphene, hexagonal boron nitride, molybdenum disulfide or tungsten disulfide having a monoatomic or monomolecular thickness. The invention also relates to a method for coating a surface with sheets of graphene, hexagonal boron nitride, molybdenum disulfide, tungsten disulfide or sheets of mixtures thereof.