Graphene Supercapacitor Nanolinear Electrodes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing supercapacitors face limitations in achieving high energy and power densities due to their construction design, which relies on solid carbon electrodes with minimum thickness and insulator sheets, resulting in poor energy density and increased costs, making them unsuitable for replacing lithium-ion batteries.

Innovation Solution

The development of graphene or activated carbon supercapacitors with nanolinear patterns and shapes, allowing for increased surface area, energy density, and power density through the use of thin substrates, large terminals, and innovative manufacturing processes that enable precise printing and stacking of elements, reducing production costs and improving mechanical resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If solid carbon electrodes with minimum thickness and insulator sheets are used, then structural strength is maintained, but energy density deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidenergy density
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces solid plate electrodes with thin flexible carbon-coated substrates. The carbon coating provides necessary electrical conductivity and structural integrity while the thin substrate enables high surface area-to-volume ratio, resolving the contradiction between structural strength and energy density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs porous carbon materials for electrode fabrication. The porous structure provides high surface area for charge accumulation while maintaining mechanical strength through the three-dimensional network, simultaneously improving energy density without sacrificing structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

2Reliability

If insulator sheets are placed between electrode pairs, then short circuit prevention is achieved, but total surface area for charge accumulation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshort circuit preventionVSAvoidtotal surface area
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the insulating function from separate sheets and integrates it into the electrode structure itself through dielectric layers deposited directly on the carbon-coated substrates. This eliminates the need for additional insulator sheets between electrode pairs, maximizing the total surface area available for charge accumulation while maintaining short circuit prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Area of stationary object

If graphene is used instead of activated carbon, then surface area and electrode miniaturization are improved, but production cost and manufacturing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface areaVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses carbon coating as an intermediary layer on flexible substrates, which can be produced through conventional coating techniques. This approach achieves the high surface area benefits of graphene-like structures while using more cost-effective materials and manufacturing processes, resolving the contradiction between surface area improvement and production cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Quantity of substance

If plate electrodes are made thinner to increase surface area, then energy density improves, but structural strength deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy densityVSAvoidstructural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates composite electrode structures by coating carbon materials on flexible substrates. The substrate provides mechanical strength and flexibility while the carbon coating provides electrical conductivity and active surface area, achieving both thin profile for high energy density and sufficient structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in supercapacitors with enhanced capacitance, energy density, power density, and mechanical resistance, enabling them to potentially replace lithium-ion batteries while being more affordable and efficient.

Implementation Method 1

Two carbon based electrodes are put in contact with a suitable electrolyte that accumulates charge via an electrostatic process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic charge accumulation: Electrostatics

Data Source

PatentUS10714273B2Graphene supercapacitor design and manufacture
Publication Date: 2020.07.14 DAYRELL IVAN ARAUJO
  • US10714273B2 patent drawing
  • US10714273B2 patent drawing
  • US10714273B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Improvements in design and manufacturing techniques to produce a graphene based prismatic supercapacitor of very high capacitance with very high energy density storage able to outperform and replace the cutting edge batteries available in the market today.