Graphene Formation Feedback Using Terahertz Laser Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The quality of graphene produced in conventional manufacturing methods is often compromised due to inappropriate radiation conditions of the processing laser beam, making it difficult to achieve high-quality graphene.

Innovation Solution

A graphene manufacturing method involving a workpiece with a resin base material and plant powder, where the surface is irradiated with terahertz waves and evaluation laser beams to form graphene, with the quality evaluated based on intensity differences, allowing for real-time adjustment of the processing laser beam conditions to enhance graphene quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If the radiation condition of the processing laser beam is not appropriately set, then the manufacturing process is simple, but the quality of graphene deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of grapheneVSAvoidcomplexity of radiation condition control
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where terahertz wave detection is used to monitor the graphene formation process in real-time. The detected terahertz wave intensity is fed back to control the processing laser beam radiation conditions, allowing automatic adjustment to achieve optimal graphene quality without complex manual control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical control of laser radiation conditions with a detection-based control system. Instead of mechanically adjusting laser parameters, the system uses terahertz wave detection to indirectly sense graphene formation and automatically controls the laser, simplifying the control mechanism while improving precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If terahertz wave detection is used to evaluate graphene quality in real-time, then the quality of graphene is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality evaluation accuracyVSAvoidcomplexity of detection system
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses terahertz waves as an intermediary to evaluate graphene quality. Instead of directly measuring complex graphene properties, the system detects terahertz wave intensity changes caused by graphene formation, providing a simplified yet accurate quality assessment method.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The terahertz wave detection system serves multiple functions: it monitors graphene formation in real-time, evaluates graphene quality, and provides feedback for process control. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate detection and control systems, offsetting the added complexity with operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Manufacturing precision

If the processing laser beam radiation conditions are optimized, then the quality of graphene is improved, but the manufacturing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of grapheneVSAvoidmanufacturing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous monitoring and control during the graphene manufacturing process. The terahertz wave detection operates continuously to track graphene formation, and the laser radiation conditions are continuously adjusted based on feedback, ensuring optimal quality without unnecessary process interruptions or extensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses real-time detection to identify the optimal moment when graphene formation is complete. By detecting terahertz wave intensity changes, the system can determine when to stop the processing laser beam, avoiding unnecessary extended processing time while ensuring high-quality graphene production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enables the production of high-quality graphene by accurately setting the radiation conditions of the processing laser beam, improving electron mobility and manufacturing efficiency while reducing defects in the lattice structure.

Implementation Method 1

a third step of irradiating a processing region of the surface with a processing laser beam to form graphene in the processing region

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser-induced graphitization: Laser Ablation

Implementation Method 2

a second step of irradiating a surface of the workpiece with a terahertz wave and an evaluation laser beam and detecting the terahertz wave from the surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTerahertz wave detection: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS20240208822A1Graphene manufacturing method
Publication Date: 2024.06.27 HAMAMATSU PHOTONICS KK
  • US20240208822A1 patent drawing
  • US20240208822A1 patent drawing
  • US20240208822A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A graphene manufacturing method includes a step of preparing a workpiece including a base material made of a resin material and a plant powder dispersed in the base material, a step of irradiating a surface of the workpiece with a terahertz wave and an evaluation laser beam and detecting the terahertz wave from the surface, a step of irradiating a processing region of the surface with a processing laser beam to form graphene in the processing region, a step of irradiating the processing region with the terahertz wave and the evaluation laser beam and detecting the terahertz wave from the processing region, and a step of evaluating quality of the graphene in the processing region based on an intensity difference between the terahertz wave detected in the step and the terahertz wave detected in the step.