Graphene Transfer with Polymer Support for Clean Flat Layers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for transferring graphene layers onto substrates result in non-uniform, contaminated, and wrinkled layers, leading to poor signal-to-background ratios and interference in electron microscopy, which are costly and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

A method involving chemical vapor deposition of graphene on a metal foil, stabilization with a cellulose-based polymer, etching with ammonium persulfate, and dry cleaning with activated carbon to achieve a clean, uniform, and flat graphene layer on a target substrate.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional transfer methods are used to obtain graphene layers, then the process is simple and fast, but the graphene layers become non-uniform, contaminated, and wrinkled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegraphene layer uniformityVSAvoidtransfer process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The transfer process is divided into distinct stages: (1) growth on metal foil, (2) stabilization with cellulose-based polymer, (3) etching with ammonium persulfate, and (4) dry cleaning with activated carbon. Each stage addresses specific quality issues independently, allowing systematic improvement of graphene layer uniformity and cleanliness without overwhelming complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A cellulose-based polymer layer is applied to the graphene layer before etching to stabilize it during the subsequent ammonium persulfate etching process. This preliminary stabilization prevents wrinkles and maintains uniformity during the transfer process, addressing quality issues before they occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 3:

The cellulose-based polymer acts as an intermediary between the graphene layer and the etching solution, providing mechanical support and preventing direct contact that could cause wrinkling. The activated carbon serves as an intermediary cleaning agent that removes contaminants without damaging the graphene structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If graphene layers are transferred using existing methods, then the process is quick, but the signal-to-background ratio deteriorates due to contamination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal-to-background ratioVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Ammonium persulfate, a strong oxidizing agent, is used to etch away metal foil contaminants from the graphene layer. This accelerated oxidation process effectively removes contamination that would otherwise degrade the signal-to-background ratio in electron microscopy, achieving high measurement precision through chemical purification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #38Strong oxidants (Accelerated oxidation)

Solution Approach 2:

Activated carbon, a porous material with high surface area, is used in the dry cleaning step to adsorb and remove organic contaminants from the graphene layer. The porous structure provides numerous binding sites for contaminants, effectively cleaning the graphene without requiring lengthy processing times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

3Ease of manufacture

If amorphous carbon-based supports are used, then the manufacturing is simple, but the background signal increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport manufacturing simplicityVSAvoidbackground signal
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the material parameter from amorphous carbon to crystalline graphene, which fundamentally alters the background signal characteristics. Graphene's periodic crystalline structure produces a distinctive diffraction pattern that can be easily distinguished and subtracted, transforming a harmful background signal into a manageable artifact while maintaining manufacturing simplicity through CVD growth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The final support structure combines multiple materials: metal foil (growth substrate), cellulose-based polymer (temporary stabilizer), and graphene (final support layer). This composite approach allows each material to perform its optimal function, with the graphene providing the thin, low-background support while the other materials facilitate the transfer process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Object-generated harmful factors

If graphene layers are made thinner to reduce background signal, then the background signal decreases, but the structural integrity and flatness deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebackground signalVSAvoidgraphene layer flatness
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The cellulose-based polymer layer is applied beforehand to cushion and support the thin graphene layer during handling and transfer. This preliminary protective layer prevents mechanical damage and wrinkling that would otherwise occur with such thin material, maintaining flatness while preserving the low background signal advantage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The cellulose-based polymer acts as a mediator between external mechanical stresses and the thin graphene layer, absorbing and distributing forces that would otherwise cause wrinkling or deformation. This intermediary protection enables the use of ultra-thin graphene without sacrificing structural integrity or flatness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method produces high-quality graphene layers with improved signal-to-background ratios, reduced contamination, and enhanced thermal and electrical conductivity, suitable for electron microscopy and other applications.

Implementation Method 1

chemical vapor deposition of graphene on a metal foil

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical vapor deposition: Chemical Vapour Deposition

Implementation Method 2

etching with ammonium persulfate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEtching:

Implementation Method 3

dry cleaning with activated carbon

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Implementation Method 4

heating the activated carbon

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS20250214331A1Graphene layer transfer method
Publication Date: 2025.07.03 TURCK HOLDING GMBH
  • US20250214331A1 patent drawing
  • US20250214331A1 patent drawing
  • US20250214331A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of transferring a graphene layer onto a target substrate or support structure. The method includes obtaining a metal foil onto which the graphene layer is provided, stabilizing the graphene layer by applying a layer of a cellulose-based polymer onto the graphene layer, and placing the metal foil with the graphene and the polymer layers in or on an etching solution to dissolve the metal foil supporting the graphene layer. The method includes diluting and/or neutralizing the etching solution after the metal foil has been dissolved, and depositing the graphene layer onto the target by placing the target underneath the graphene layer and removing the diluted and/or neutralized solution until the graphene layer settles onto the target. The method includes a dry cleaning of the target to remove the polymer layer by embedding the target in activated carbon and heating.