Graphenic Metal-Oxide Air Electrode Catalyst for Zn-Air ORR/OER

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The development of metal-air batteries, particularly Zn-air batteries, is limited by the low efficiency of the air electrode due to the low kinetic reaction of the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) during discharge and the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) during charge, and existing catalysts often lack stability and are based on costly or toxic noble metals.

Innovation Solution

A catalyst comprising particles of iron oxide or manganese oxide combined with graphenic carbon materials, such as graphene, which are synthesized using an industrially scalable method, providing a stable and cost-effective solution for both ORR and OER, with a synergistic effect from the mixture of metals and carbonaceous materials.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If noble metal catalysts (Pt, Ir) are used, then catalytic activity for ORR and OER is improved, but cost increases and stability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst stabilityVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive noble metals with abundant, low-cost transition metals (Fe, Mn) that can be obtained from waste batteries. These base metal catalysts provide comparable catalytic activity for ORR and OER reactions while dramatically reducing cost and improving sustainability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the oxidation states and ratios of Fe and Mn metals to achieve optimal catalytic performance. By controlling the metal composition parameters (Fe:Mn ratio, oxidation states), the catalyst achieves high stability and activity without requiring noble metals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Quantity of substance

If base metal catalysts (Fe, Mn) are used, then cost decreases and stability improves, but catalytic activity for ORR and OER worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecostVSAvoidcatalytic activity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a composite catalyst system combining Fe and Mn metals in specific ratios, along with carbonaceous materials and conductive additives. This composite structure synergistically enhances the catalytic activity of base metals to match or exceed noble metal performance while maintaining low cost and high stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the local distribution and oxidation states of Fe and Mn atoms within the catalyst particles to create active sites with enhanced catalytic activity. The non-uniform distribution of metal species and their specific oxidation states locally maximize the ORR and OER reaction rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If high metal loading is used, then catalytic activity is improved, but mass transport limitations and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalytic activityVSAvoidmass transport efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs porous carbonaceous materials and optimized catalyst particle structures that provide high surface area and efficient mass transport pathways. The porous structure allows adequate metal loading while maintaining good oxygen diffusion and electron transport, avoiding mass transport limitations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The catalyst demonstrates improved stability and efficiency in both discharge and charge cycles, maintaining high voltage efficiency even after multiple cycles, and is made from abundant, environmentally friendly metals, enhancing the performance of metal-air batteries.

Implementation Method 1

the carbonaceous material is a graphenic carbon material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 2

the low kinetic reaction of the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) during the discharge

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 3

in the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) during the charge of the rechargeable battery

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentUS20240039006A1Catalyst and metal-air battery
Publication Date: 2024.02.01 GNANOMAT SL
  • US20240039006A1 patent drawing
  • US20240039006A1 patent drawing
  • US20240039006A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Catalyst (14) having particles with a metal oxide and a carbonaceous material, wherein the metal oxide is an iron oxide or manganese oxide, and the carbonaceous material is a graphenic carbon material. Metal-air battery (10) having a metal electrode (11), an air electrode (13) with the catalyst (14) and an electrolyte (12) disposed between the metal electrode (11) and the air electrode (13).