Graphical Format Selector for Search Results

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing search result presentation systems do not effectively adapt to the context of the search and the type of data being searched, often displaying results in formats that are not optimized for viewing or relevance.

Innovation Solution

A system that selects a graphical format for presenting search results based on associated metadata and search context, using a graphical format selector to evaluate format selection rules and choose from list, timeline, two-dimensional linear, human network, or geographical formats, and renders the results accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If search results are displayed in a fixed list format, then the presentation is simple and easy to implement, but the format does not adapt to different search contexts and data types

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to search contextVSAvoidcomplexity of format selection system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the presentation parameters of search results by selecting different graphical formats (list, timeline, geographical, human network) based on metadata attributes such as date, location, and relationship types. This allows the same search results to be displayed in different formats depending on the data characteristics and search context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The graphical format selector automatically determines the appropriate presentation format by evaluating metadata and search context without requiring user intervention. The system self-determines the best format based on predefined rules and characteristics of the search results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If multiple graphical formats are provided for search results, then the presentation can be optimized for different contexts, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of viewing search resultsVSAvoidcomplexity of graphical format selector
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the graphical format selector evaluates metadata and search context to determine the most appropriate format. The selector uses feedback from the data characteristics to automatically adjust the presentation format, making the system adaptive without requiring manual user configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If search results are presented in a generic format, then the implementation is straightforward, but the relevance and usability of the results decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelevance of search resultsVSAvoidcomplexity of format evaluation rules
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different presentation qualities to different aspects of the search results based on their characteristics. For example, results with location metadata are presented in geographical format, while results with temporal metadata use timeline format. This localized adaptation of presentation quality enhances relevance for each specific type of data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS8583618B2Determination of graphical format to present search results
Publication Date: 2013.11.12 BUSINESS OBJECTS
  • US8583618B2 patent drawing
  • US8583618B2 patent drawing
  • US8583618B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Some aspects include reception of a plurality of search results, selection of a graphical format in which to present the search results from a plurality of graphical formats based on metadata of the plurality of search results, and presentation of the plurality of search results in the selected graphical format.