Graphical Fraud Detection Model for Cryptocurrency Transactions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fraud scoring methodologies for cryptocurrency transactions are generalized and do not adequately address the specific risk factors associated with cryptocurrencies, leading to a lack of effective fraud protection in blockchain transactions.

Innovation Solution

The system employs multiple data sets and graphical modeling to generate a fraud detection model. This model includes a graphical representation of the blockchain network, which is used in conjunction with transaction data from both fiat-based and cryptographic currency transactions to calculate a fraud score for new blockchain transactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If generalized fraud scoring methodologies are used for cryptocurrency transactions, then the system is simple to implement, but the fraud detection accuracy is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fraud detection system is segmented into multiple independent components: a graph generation module that creates visual representations of transaction networks, a machine learning module that analyzes these graphs, and a fraud scoring module that generates risk assessments. This segmentation allows each component to specialize in specific tasks, improving overall detection accuracy while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from traditional tabular transaction data to a graphical dimension, representing cryptocurrency transactions as nodes and edges in a network graph. This dimensional change enables the capture of relational patterns and transaction flows that are invisible in conventional data structures, significantly enhancing fraud detection capability through spatial and topological analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If multiple data sets and graphical modeling are used, then the fraud detection accuracy improves, but the computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-generating graphical representations of transaction networks and pre-training machine learning models on historical fraud data before actual fraud detection occurs. This allows the computationally intensive tasks to be prepared in advance, reducing real-time computational requirements when actual fraud scoring is needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces traditional mechanical fraud detection methods with machine learning-based graphical analysis. Instead of relying on rule-based systems and manual analysis, the patent employs automated machine learning models that process graphical data, reducing manual computational effort while improving detection accuracy through pattern recognition capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If traditional fraud scoring methods are used, then the processing speed is fast, but the ability to detect cryptocurrency-specific fraud patterns is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecryptocurrency fraud pattern recognitionVSAvoidtransaction processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the fundamental parameters of fraud analysis by transitioning from numerical transaction attributes to graphical topological parameters. Instead of analyzing transaction amounts, timestamps, and parties in tabular form, the system represents these as nodes and edges with topological relationships, enabling detection of fraud patterns specific to cryptocurrency networks while maintaining processing efficiency through optimized graph algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250053985A1Method and system for cryptocurrency fraud detection
Publication Date: 2025.02.13 MASTERCARD INT INC
  • US20250053985A1 patent drawing
  • US20250053985A1 patent drawing
  • US20250053985A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for fraud scoring a cryptographic currency transaction using multiple data sets and graphical modeling includes: receiving transaction data for a plurality of fiat currency based payment transactions from a first computing system; receiving transaction data for a plurality of cryptographic currency based blockchain transactions from a second computing system; receiving node connectivity data for a blockchain network from a third computing system; generating a fraud detection model based on the node connectivity data including generating a graphical representation of the node connectivity data; receiving transaction data for a new blockchain transaction from a computing device; generating a fraud score for the new transaction using the fraud detection model, the transaction data for the fiat currency based transactions, and the transaction data for the cryptographic currency based transactions; and transmitting the generated fraud score to the computing device.