Graphical Strategy Development for Manufacturing Controllers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for developing strategies for data analysis and monitoring in manufacturing processes require extensive computer programming, limiting flexibility and requiring skilled programmers for major changes, making them inflexible and time-consuming.

Innovation Solution

A graphical approach using computer graphics to develop strategies, allowing users to create and visualize data analysis and monitoring operations on a 2D graph, eliminating the need for programming by dragging objects representing data acquisition, transformation, and operating limits, with automatic generation and updating of strategies, and integration with databases for data retrieval and strategy deployment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If hand-written computer code is used for strategy development, then the strategy structure is fixed and parameter adjustments are possible, but major strategy changes require experienced software programmers and are time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of strategy developmentVSAvoidprogramming complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of hand-written computer code with a graphical user interface-based strategy development system. Users interact with visual elements on a graph (such as drag-and-drop components, visual parameters, and graphical representations of data operations) instead of writing programming code. This substitution eliminates the need for programming knowledge while maintaining the ability to create and modify strategies, directly resolving the contradiction between ease of strategy development and programming complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If fixed structure strategies are used, then implementation is straightforward, but flexibility for major changes is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrategy flexibilityVSAvoidstrategy modification complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic strategy development system where the graphical interface allows users to easily modify strategy components, add new elements, and adjust parameters through visual interactions. The system dynamically updates the strategy based on user actions on the graph, enabling flexible adaptation without requiring complex programming modifications. This dynamic approach resolves the contradiction by making strategies both implementable and easily adaptable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If programming-based strategy development is used, then precise control is achieved, but the process is time-consuming and requires skilled personnel

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrategy development speedVSAvoidoperational skill requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-service strategy development system where users can independently create, modify, and deploy strategies through the graphical interface without requiring external programming expertise. The system provides intuitive visual tools that automatically handle the complex underlying operations, allowing users to service their own strategy development needs. This resolves the contradiction by dramatically improving both development speed and ease of operation through automated visual interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Manufacturing precision

If manual code writing is required for strategy changes, then precision in implementation is maintained, but development time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrategy implementation precisionVSAvoidstrategy development time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses graphical representations as visual copies or models of the actual strategy operations. These graphical elements on the graph serve as intuitive templates that users can manipulate to precisely define strategy behavior without writing code. The system translates these visual copies into precise operational instructions automatically, maintaining implementation precision while dramatically reducing development time through the visual modeling approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS7876324B2Method and system for developing a strategy for use in a controller and storage medium for storing instructions which effectuate the method
Publication Date: 2011.01.25 PROMESS
  • US7876324B2 patent drawing
  • US7876324B2 patent drawing
  • US7876324B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for developing a strategy for use in a controller and storage medium for storing instructions which effectuate the method are provided. A computer graphical approach of at least one embodiment of the invention eliminates computer programming by presenting a user with a blank 2-dimensional graph on a computer screen along with X and Y axes. Using available toolbars and palettes, the user drags appropriate graphical objects into the graph. Each object represents an operation to perform data analysis or monitoring such as: data acquisition, data transformation or operating limits.