Graphical System Behavior Modification via Parameter Bounds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modifying the behavior of a system from its graphical representation is often tedious and time-consuming, especially as the number of parameters and desired behaviors increases, requiring a more efficient method to control system characteristics.

Innovation Solution

A method that involves providing a graphical representation of a modeled system, setting bounds for the behavior, calculating deviations using vertical, horizontal, and proximity measures, and modifying parameters based on these deviations to achieve desired behavior characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If trial and error method is used to adjust parameters to control system behavior, then system behavior can be modified, but the process becomes tedious and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of modifying system behaviorVSAvoidtime consumption for parameter adjustment
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements automatic feedback mechanisms where the graphical representation of system behavior is continuously monitored against desired specifications. The system automatically calculates deviations and adjusts parameters based on this feedback, eliminating the need for manual trial and error adjustments by users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-adjustment of parameters by automatically interpreting the graphical behavior representation and modifying parameters to achieve desired system characteristics. This self-service capability removes the tedious manual intervention required in traditional approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If the number of parameters and behaviors to be modified increases, then system functionality is enhanced, but the difficulty of controlling behavior increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem behavior characteristicsVSAvoidcomplexity of controlling behavior
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary computational layer that automatically processes the relationship between multiple parameters and system behaviors. This intermediary system handles the complex calculations and coordinate adjustments across multiple parameters, shielding users from the underlying complexity while enabling enhanced system functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically modifies multiple parameters simultaneously based on deviations detected in the graphical behavior representation. By coordinating changes across multiple parameters through automated computation, the system manages complexity while achieving desired behavioral characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If manual parameter adjustment is used to achieve desired behavior characteristics, then system behavior can be controlled, but the process is tedious and increases in difficulty

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of behavior characteristicsVSAvoidease of controlling parameters
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical adjustment processes with automated computational systems. The system automatically calculates the precise parameter adjustments needed to achieve desired behavior characteristics, substituting manual trial and error with algorithmic precision and computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors system behavior through graphical representation and automatically adjusts parameters to achieve precise desired characteristics. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures high precision in behavior control while maintaining ease of operation through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS7539604B1Automatic modification of the behavior of system from a graphical representation of the behavior
Publication Date: 2009.05.26 MATHWORKS INC
  • US7539604B1 patent drawing
  • US7539604B1 patent drawing
  • US7539604B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides a method of modifying the behavior of a modeled system from a graphical representation of the behavior of the system. Given a graphical representation of the behavior of a modeled system, one or more bounds may be selected for the behavior on the graphical representation. The necessary parameters for the modeled system are then determined for producing the desired behavior based on the selected bounds for the behavior.