Graphite-Copper Heat Sink Composite With Thin Copper Layers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing graphite-copper composite materials do not achieve the desired high and stable thermal conductivity required for advanced technologies like IoT and electric vehicles, due to issues with copper's thermal expansion coefficient and impurities hindering conductivity.

Innovation Solution

A graphite-copper composite material is produced using pretreated scaly graphite particles and copper particles with a median diameter of 1.5 μm or less, with a copper layer thickness of 15 μm or less, and controlled impurity levels, sintered via a multiaxial electric current method to ensure close contact and reduced interfacial gaps.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the copper layer thickness is reduced to improve thermal conductivity, then thermal conductivity increases, but mechanical strength deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal conductivityVSAvoidmechanical strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention optimizes the copper layer thickness parameter to 15 μm or less, and controls copper particle median diameter to 1.5 μm or less, achieving a balance between thermal conductivity and mechanical strength through precise parameter control rather than extreme values

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates a composite structure with scaly graphite particles and copper layer, where the graphite provides mechanical strength and the copper provides thermal conductivity, achieving synergistic effects that resolve the contradiction between the two properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If copper particle size is reduced to improve thermal conductivity, then thermal conductivity increases, but manufacturing precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal conductivityVSAvoidparticle size control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention specifies copper particles with median diameter of 1.5 μm or less, using precise parameter control to achieve high thermal conductivity while maintaining manufacturability through defined particle size distributions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses copper particles of specific size ranges (median diameter 1.5 μm or less) to create localized optimal thermal conduction paths while maintaining overall structural integrity and manufacturability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If the interfacial gap is reduced to improve thermal conductivity, then thermal conductivity increases, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal conductivityVSAvoidinterface control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention controls the interfacial gap parameter to 150 nm or less through optimization of the copper layer and graphite particle interface, achieving high thermal conductivity while managing manufacturing complexity through defined structural parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If copper volume fraction is increased to improve thermal conductivity, then thermal conductivity increases, but thermal expansion coefficient increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal conductivityVSAvoidthermal expansion coefficient
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The invention optimizes the copper volume fraction to 3-20%, finding the optimal range that provides sufficient thermal conductivity while limiting the thermal expansion coefficient increase, demonstrating parameter optimization to resolve the contradiction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses a composite of scaly graphite particles and copper layer where graphite (with low thermal expansion) compensates for copper's high thermal expansion, allowing copper volume fraction to be optimized for thermal conductivity while maintaining stable thermal expansion characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The composite material achieves a thermal conductivity of 750 W/(m·K) or more with a low standard deviation, high flexural strength, and a low thermal expansion coefficient, suitable for high-performance electronic components.

Implementation Method 1

a step of sintering a molded body obtained by molding the molding raw material by a multiaxial electric current sintering method

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentUS12534372B2Graphite-copper composite material, heat sink member using the same, and method for producing graphite-copper composite material
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 UBE CORPORATION
  • US12534372B2 patent drawing
  • US12534372B2 patent drawing
  • US12534372B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A graphite-copper composite material that includes a copper layer having an average thickness of 15 μm or less and scaly graphite particles laminated with the copper layer interposed therebetween. The graphite-copper composite material has a copper volume fraction of 3 to 20%. The graphite-copper composite material further has: (A) copper crystal grains of the copper layer having an average grain size of 2.8 μm or less, a mass fraction of Al of less than 0.02%, and a mass fraction of Si of less than 0.04%, or (B) an interfacial gap of the copper layer and the scaly graphite particles of 150 nm or less.