Graphite Crucible Arcuate Indentation for Uniform Heating

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing crucibles for fusion analysis suffer from hot spots, high power consumption, and electrode contamination due to uneven heating, leading to specimen bubbling and potential breakage under compressive force.

Innovation Solution

A graphite crucible design featuring a cylindrical body with an inwardly projecting concave arcuate annular indentation and a disk-shaped pedestal base, providing even heating and reduced power requirements through optimized geometry and dimensions, allowing for uniform current distribution and reduced electrode wear.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If conventional graphite crucible design is used, then crucible can reach high fusion temperature, but hot spots occur causing uneven heating and specimen bubbling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefusion temperatureVSAvoidheating uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The crucible incorporates a concave arcuate annular indentation with specifically engineered geometry (56-60 degree divergence angle, optimized radius of curvature) to create localized current distribution patterns. This geometric modification ensures uniform current density across the crucible floor and lower side walls, eliminating hot spots while maintaining the ability to reach 3000°C fusion temperature.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the geometric parameters of the crucible structure by introducing a concave arcuate annular indentation with specific angular dimensions (56-60 degrees) and curvature radii. This parameter optimization redistributes the electrical current path, transforming the heating pattern from uneven with hot spots to uniform across the specimen area, while still achieving the required high temperature.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Temperature

If higher power is applied to achieve fusion temperature, then temperature requirement is met, but power consumption increases by significant margin

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefusion temperatureVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

By optimizing the geometric parameters of the crucible structure—specifically the concave arcuate annular indentation with 56-60 degree divergence angle—the invention improves electrical current distribution efficiency. This allows the system to achieve 3000°C fusion temperature with up to 30% lower power consumption by minimizing energy losses and ensuring uniform heating across the specimen area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional crucible geometry is used, then manufacturing is simple, but hot spots cause specimen bubbling and electrode contamination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrucible fabricationVSAvoidspecimen bubbling and electrode contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The concave arcuate annular indentation with 56-60 degree divergence angle creates a localized geometric feature that controls current distribution. This simple geometric modification, easily manufactured into the graphite crucible, prevents hot spots and the associated harmful effects of specimen bubbling and electrode contamination, while maintaining manufacturing simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Strength

If crucible structure is strengthened to withstand compressive force, then structural integrity improves, but hot spots and uneven heating persist

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompressive strengthVSAvoidheating uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention decouples the structural strength function from the heating uniformity function by incorporating a concave arcuate annular indentation with specific geometry. The crucible maintains adequate structural integrity to withstand electrode compression while the optimized geometric parameters ensure uniform current distribution and heating, eliminating hot spots without compromising strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The crucible achieves 3000°C fusion temperature with up to 30% less power consumption, preventing specimen bubbling and electrode contamination while maintaining structural integrity under compressive forces.

Implementation Method 1

a current example of such an analytical instrument is an ONH836 furnace and analyzer available from Leco Corporation of St. Joseph, Mich. Such instruments employ a pair of electrodes, which clamp a graphite crucible therebetween and provide up to 1000 or more amps current through the graphite crucible for heating the crucible and specimen to the near 3000° C. temperature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Implementation Method 2

The crucible is made of a resistive material, such as graphite, and comprises a generally cylindrical body with an open mouth at the top and a pedestal base. An inwardly projecting concave arcuate annular indentation extends between the body and pedestal base with a smoothly curved radius of curvature. The upper and lower walls of the arcuate indentation diverge outwardly at an angle of from about 56° to about 60°.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical resistance distribution: Electrical Resistance

Data Source

PatentUS9527076B2Crucible
Publication Date: 2016.12.27 LECO CORP
  • US9527076B2 patent drawing
  • US9527076B2 patent drawing
  • US9527076B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A graphite crucible has a cylindrical body with an upper opening for receiving a sample for analysis and a disk-shaped pedestal base. The pedestal base includes a bottom surface with a centrally formed circular indentation. An inwardly projecting concave arcuate annular indentation extends between the body and pedestal base with a smoothly curved radius of curvature. The upper and lower walls of the arcuate indentation diverge outwardly at an angle of from about 56° to about 60°.