Graphite Foam Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchangers for Low-Delta-T Transfer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Shell-and-tube heat exchangers have limited heat transfer efficiency, which hampers their performance in various industrial and thermal transfer applications.

Innovation Solution

The integration of thermally conductive foam heat transfer units, such as graphite foam, with the tubes, combined with liquid spraying and optimized tube configurations, enhances heat transfer efficiency. Additionally, the use of friction-stir-welding for tube connections and baffles to increase fluid path and residence time further improves efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional shell-and-tube heat exchanger configuration is used, then the structure is simple and economical to build, but heat transfer efficiency is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease to buildVSAvoidheat transfer efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces graphite foam, a porous material with high thermal conductivity, as a heat transfer enhancement unit. The foam's porous structure provides large surface area for heat exchange while maintaining structural integrity, directly addressing the heat transfer efficiency limitation of conventional smooth-tube designs without compromising manufacturability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines graphite foam with metal tube structures to create a composite heat transfer system. The graphite foam serves as the heat transfer enhancement medium while the metal tubes provide structural support and fluid conduit functions, achieving high efficiency through material synergies while remaining economical to manufacture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Productivity

If graphite foam heat transfer units are integrated with tubes, then heat transfer efficiency is significantly enhanced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat transfer efficiencyVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The graphite foam is divided into discrete heat transfer units that can be individually installed on tube bundles. This segmentation allows for modular assembly, simplifying the integration process and reducing overall device complexity while maintaining the heat transfer efficiency benefits of the foam structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The graphite foam acts as an intermediary heat transfer medium between the tube surface and the shell-side fluid. This intermediary layer enhances heat transfer by providing a large surface area for thermal exchange, while the foam's flexible structure adapts to tube configurations, minimizing the increase in device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If liquid spraying is used to maximize energy transfer, then evaporator efficiency is increased, but device complexity and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaporator efficiencyVSAvoidspray system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The liquid spray system uses dynamic spraying mechanisms that can adjust spray patterns, coverage area, and liquid distribution based on operational conditions. This dynamic capability maximizes evaporator efficiency by optimizing heat transfer while keeping the spray system relatively simple through adaptive control rather than complex fixed infrastructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The described configuration significantly enhances heat transfer efficiency, making the heat exchangers suitable for low thermal driving force applications, power generation, and non-power generation applications like refrigeration and cryogenics, while being inexpensive and corrosion-resistant.

Implementation Method 1

The foam of the heat transfer units can be any thermally conductive foam material that enhances heat transfer, for example graphite foam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

The heat exchanger employs spraying of liquid to maximize the energy transfer through the use of large surface/volume ratio of the sprayed liquid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Data Source

PatentUS9951997B2Staged graphite foam heat exchangers
Publication Date: 2018.04.24 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
  • US9951997B2 patent drawing
  • US9951997B2 patent drawing
  • US9951997B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Shell-and-tube heat exchangers that utilize one or more foam heat transfer units engaged with the tubes to enhance the heat transfer between first and second fluids. The foam of the heat transfer units can be any thermally conductive foam material that enhances heat transfer. In an embodiment, a liquid distribution unit is employed that sprays a fluid to maximize the energy transfer through the use of large surface/volume ratio of the sprayed fluid. The spraying can be used in combination with or separately from the foam heat transfer units. Also, the tubes can be helically twisted around the liquid distribution unit so that the sprayed fluid impinges on the tubes. The shell-and-tube heat exchangers described herein are highly efficient, inexpensive to build, and corrosion resistant. The heat exchangers can be configured as an evaporator, a condenser, or for single phase cooling or heating thermal transfer applications.