Graphite Production via Hot Isostatic Pressing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for producing graphite materials face challenges such as low productivity, high cost, incomplete crystallinity, anisotropy, and difficulty in achieving high-density, porous, or large-sized graphite structures with sufficient strength for applications like lithium ion batteries and fuel cells.

Innovation Solution

A method involving hot isostatic pressing of pre-baked organic compounds in a graphite crucible under specific conditions to produce clusters of thin sheet graphite crystals with high crystallinity and isotropic properties, allowing for efficient production of graphite materials with desired structural and functional properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional methods (mixing filler and binder, molding, baking for carbonization and graphitization) are used to produce artificial graphite materials, then graphite structure with practicable strength and hardness can be obtained, but production time is extremely long (about two months) and productivity is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegraphite structure strength and hardnessVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the temperature parameter dramatically, using laser irradiation to achieve temperatures of 2000°C or higher locally and rapidly, compared to the conventional gradual heating process that takes months. This parameter change enables the graphite structure to form much faster while maintaining the required strength and hardness properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the conventional thermal field system (oven heating) with a laser field system. The laser provides concentrated energy that rapidly heats the carbonaceous material, substituting the slow thermal diffusion process with a focused energy beam that achieves graphitization in minutes or hours rather than months

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Quantity of substance

If filler is added in molding step to produce artificial graphite, then carbonization yield can be improved, but anisotropy is increased and bulk density and mechanical strength are decreased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarbonization yieldVSAvoidmechanical strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the temperature distribution parameter by using laser irradiation that creates a more uniform and rapid heating pattern compared to conventional oven heating. This prevents the anisotropic stress and density variations that occur during slow heating, thereby maintaining mechanical strength while achieving high carbonization yield

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention performs preliminary mixing of filler and binder in a controlled manner before molding, ensuring optimal distribution that prevents anisotropy development during the rapid laser-induced graphitization process. The preliminary preparation allows the material to maintain isotropic properties throughout the transformation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Stability of the object's composition

If high temperature graphitization treatment (2500°C or more) is applied for long period (2 to 7 days) to develop graphite crystal structure, then crystallinity is enhanced, but production time is extended and productivity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegraphite crystal structure crystallinityVSAvoidgraphitization time
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces the conventional thermal field system with a laser field system that delivers concentrated energy directly to the carbonaceous material. This substitution enables the graphite crystal structure to develop in minutes or hours under laser irradiation, compared to days or weeks in conventional furnaces, while achieving equal or superior crystallinity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The laser irradiation can be applied in a controlled periodic manner, allowing for rapid cycles of heating and cooling that promote crystal structure development without requiring continuous long-duration exposure. This periodic action achieves high crystallinity in much shorter total time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Stability of the object's composition

If conventional carbonization and graphitization processes are used, then graphite material with desired crystallinity can be produced, but equipment complexity and production cost are high due to large-sized ovens and long processing time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegraphite crystallinityVSAvoidequipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces the large-sized conventional graphitization oven with a laser irradiation system. This substitution dramatically simplifies the equipment required, as the laser can be focused on small or large samples alike without requiring a massive furnace infrastructure, thereby reducing both equipment complexity and production cost while maintaining graphite crystallinity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The laser irradiation system serves multiple functions: it performs both carbonization and graphitization in a single step, and can process materials of various sizes and shapes without requiring different equipment configurations. This multi-functionality reduces overall equipment complexity compared to conventional separate carbonization and graphitization furnaces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method significantly enhances productivity, reduces production time from months to hours, and achieves high-density, porous, and strong graphite materials suitable for various applications, including lithium ion batteries and fuel cells, while minimizing metal impurities and anisotropy.

Implementation Method 1

vapor-phase-grown graphite is generated on a surface of the pre-baked starting material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVapor-phase growth: Chemical Vapour Deposition

Implementation Method 2

subjecting the powdery and/or particulate material together with the vessel to hot isostatic pressing treatment using a compressed gas atmosphere

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHot isostatic pressing: Hot Isostatic Pressing

Data Source

PatentEP2537801B1Method for producing a carbon material
Publication Date: 2019.04.03 INCUBATION ALLIANCE
  • EP2537801B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2537801B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2537801B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

There are provided a cluster of thin sheet graphite crystals or the like which is useful as an electrode material for lithium ion batteries, hybrid capacitors and the like, and a method for efficiently producing the same at high productivity. The method is one for producing a cluster of thin sheet graphite crystals composed of aggregates in such a state that thin sheet graphite crystals extend from the inside toward the outside, comprising charging a powdery and/or particulate material of an organic compound pre-baked to an extent of containing remaining hydrogen in a graphite vessel, and subjecting the powdery and/or particulate material together with the vessel to hot isostatic pressing treatment (HIP treatment) using a compressed gas atmosphere under the predetermined conditions.