Graphite Intercalation for Nano-Structure Production

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for producing commercial-scale quantities of nano-structures like nano-tubes and buckyballs are expensive, laborious, and not feasible due to the need for exotic equipment and extreme process parameters, making them unsuitable for industry-scale use.

Innovation Solution

A process involving Stage III or lower graphite intercalation compounds, where graphite flakes are intercalated with a volatile compound and then exposed to high heat to separate graphene layers, forming nano-structures in a controlled environment, such as a gas plasma or arc, without requiring extreme conditions or exotic materials.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional methods (HiPCO, PLV, CVD, CA) are used to produce nano-structures, then nano-structures can be formed, but production is expensive, laborious, and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the temperature parameter from extreme conditions to moderate temperatures (below 400°C), and changes the pressure parameter from high pressure to atmospheric pressure, enabling simple and efficient production of nano-structures without exotic equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses readily available, inexpensive materials such as calcium carbonate, calcium oxide, and common acids/bases instead of expensive exotic materials, making the process economically viable for commercial production

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Reliability

If exotic equipment and extreme process parameters are used, then nano-structures can be produced, but the process becomes unsuitable for industry-scale use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess feasibilityVSAvoidequipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses naturally occurring calcium carbonate (limestone) as the carbon source, which is abundant and requires no special processing or exotic equipment to obtain, making the process self-sufficient and industrially scalable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention performs reactions in aqueous solutions under atmospheric conditions without requiring inert atmospheres or extreme environments, simplifying equipment requirements while maintaining process reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

3Manufacturing precision

If high temperature exposure is applied to intercalated graphite, then graphene layers separate to form nano-structures, but extreme temperatures are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenano-structure formationVSAvoidprocessing temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses intercalation compounds as intermediaries where guest molecules are inserted between graphite layers, creating a structured precursor that spontaneously forms nano-structures upon mild heating without requiring extreme temperatures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention performs preliminary intercalation treatment to insert guest molecules between graphite layers before heating, which pre-organizes the carbon structure and enables nano-structure formation at low temperatures during subsequent heating

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the efficient production of nano-structures in commercial quantities using natural graphite, reducing production costs and eliminating the need for unusual equipment or extreme parameters, while maintaining the directional electrical and thermal characteristics of the materials.

Implementation Method 1

providing a graphite flake comprising graphene layers; intercalating the graphite flake to form a graphite intercalation compound exhibiting Stage I, II or III intercalation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIntercalation:

Implementation Method 2

exfoliating the graphite intercalation compound by exposing it to a temperature between about 1600° C. and about 2400° C., such that a plurality of individual graphene layers are separated from the graphite intercalation compound

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal exfoliation: Thermal Expansion

Implementation Method 3

For expansion, high heat flux at the GIC's and reduced pressure both are consistent with energy and inert gas conservation, and provide expansion rather than de-intercalation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasma: Plasma

Implementation Method 4

feeding the graphite intercalation compound into a gas plasma or directly into an arc in a protective environment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric arc: Electric Arc

Data Source

PatentUS9034297B2Production of nano-structures
Publication Date: 2015.05.19 DIRECTA PLUS
  • US9034297B2 patent drawing
  • US9034297B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A process for the production of nano-structures is presented, involving providing a graphite flake comprising graphene layers; intercalating the graphite flake to form a graphite intercalation compound exhibiting Stage I, II or III intercalation; and exfoliating the graphite intercalation compound by exposing it to a temperature between about 1600° C. and about 2400° C. such that a plurality of individual graphene layers are separated from the graphite intercalation compound.