Graphite Component Interlocking for Stress Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for connecting graphite components, such as overlapping or gluing, fail to adequately transmit mechanical stresses and maintain material-specific properties, often requiring oversized components to prevent breakage and using additional fixing elements.

Innovation Solution

A three-dimensional interlocking connection between graphite plates with continuous toothing on end faces, ensuring uniform strength and stress distribution, and optionally fixed with pins or adhesive for a non-detachable bond.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If overlapping or gluing methods are used to connect graphite components, then the components can be assembled into larger structures, but the transmission of mechanical stresses at the connection point is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical stress transmissionVSAvoidconnection structure
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from two-dimensional surface connections (overlapping/gluing) to three-dimensional interlocking connections. The toothing structures extend through the thickness of the graphite components, creating interlocking joints that engage in multiple dimensions simultaneously, thereby significantly improving mechanical stress transmission capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The toothing structures feature curved, rounded contours rather than sharp angular transitions. This curvature distributes stress more evenly across the connection interface, preventing stress concentration at sharp edges and improving overall connection strength while maintaining smooth stress flow paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Adaptability or versatility

If conventional connection techniques are used, then graphite components can be joined, but material-specific properties cause restrictions in shape and dimensioning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshape and dimensioning freedomVSAvoidconnection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The toothing structures are designed with locally optimized geometries that adapt to the specific graphite material properties. The curved contours and gradual transitions are tailored to match the anisotropic nature of graphite, allowing the connection design to accommodate various shapes and dimensions while maintaining reliable stress distribution throughout the joint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If graphite components are oversized to prevent stress-induced breakage, then connection reliability improves, but component weight and material usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection reliabilityVSAvoidcomponent weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The connection is segmented into multiple toothing elements distributed across the joint interface. This segmentation allows the load to be distributed across numerous small interlocking features rather than requiring a single large connection, thereby maintaining reliability while using less material and reducing overall component weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Strength

If additional fixing elements like pins or screws are used, then connection strength improves, but device complexity and number of parts increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection strengthVSAvoidnumber of connecting elements
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The toothing structures are designed to be self-locking through their geometric configuration. The interlocking curved profiles create inherent mechanical resistance to separation and shear forces, eliminating the need for additional pins, screws, or clips. The connection derives its strength from the geometry itself rather than requiring separate fastening elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP2438312B1Arrangement for connecting special graphite parts to form multi-part graphite components
Publication Date: 2017.08.09 KGT GRAPHIT TECH
  • EP2438312B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2438312B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

The invention relates to a form and force locking connection of special graphite parts to form multi-part components, e.g. of two or more graphite plates or similar components to form one larger component, such as a flat graphite plate. By means of the invention, a form and force locking connection between special graphite parts to form multi-part graphite components is to be created, at which the joints/connection point has almost the same physical properties as the material surrounding the connection point. Said form and force locking connection is achieved by the graphite plates (1, 2) or special graphite plates being interlocked at the opposing front sides (3, 4) in a three-dimensional manner, so that one front side (3) of a graphite plate (1) has the positive form of the interlocking (5) and the front side (4) of the opposing graphite plate (2) has the negative form of the interlocking (6), wherein the interlocking (5, 6) exclusively has evenly transitioned contours between the side surfaces of the graphite plates (1, 2).