Graphite Morphology Control Through Temperature-Pressure Tuning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing processes for catalytically converting hydrocarbons to hydrogen and solid carbon lack control over the morphology of the produced carbon, which is crucial for commercial applications, and are hindered by high catalyst costs and inefficiencies in recycling and regeneration.

Innovation Solution

A process involving the use of metal-containing catalysts at controlled temperature and pressure ranges (600° C. to 1000° C. and 0 bar(g) to 100 bar(g)) to selectively synthesize graphitic materials with desired morphologies, including graphitic fibers, carbon nano-onions, carbon micro-shells, and graphene, using synthetic or non-synthetic iron oxide catalysts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional catalysts are used for catalytic cracking of hydrocarbons, then hydrogen and solid carbon are produced, but the morphology of the produced carbon cannot be controlled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemorphology controlVSAvoidmorphology selection
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically varying temperature (600-1000°C) and pressure (0-100 bar(g)) to control graphite morphology. Different temperature-pressure combinations selectively produce different morphologies: lower temperatures (600-800°C) with atmospheric pressure yield graphene and carbon nanotubes, while higher temperatures (900-1000°C) with elevated pressure produce graphite fibers and spherules. This resolves the contradiction by making morphology control possible through parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamics by enabling real-time adjustment of temperature and pressure parameters during the catalytic cracking process to dynamically control morphology formation. The process can be adapted to produce different graphite morphologies by changing operational parameters, providing versatility and control that conventional static catalyst systems lack.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If precious metal catalysts are used to achieve catalytic conversion, then conversion efficiency is improved, but catalyst cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalytic conversion efficiencyVSAvoidcatalyst cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive precious metal catalysts with inexpensive iron oxide-based catalysts that can be easily obtained from common materials like magnetite ore. While individual catalyst particles may deplete as they become encapsulated in carbon, the low cost allows for simple replacement rather than complex recycling, effectively treating them as disposable but economical catalysts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes catalytic conversion efficiency through parameter changes in temperature (600-1000°C) and pressure (0-100 bar(g)) rather than relying on expensive catalyst materials. These parameter optimizations enable high conversion efficiency with inexpensive iron oxide catalysts, resolving the contradiction between productivity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If catalyst recycling and regeneration processes are implemented, then catalyst reuse is achieved, but process complexity and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst reuseVSAvoidrecycling and regeneration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adopts a disposable catalyst approach where inexpensive iron oxide catalysts are replaced rather than recycled. Since the catalysts are so cheap and readily available, the time and complexity of recycling/regeneration processes are avoided by simply replacing depleted catalysts with fresh ones, maintaining continuous production without interruption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The iron oxide catalysts exhibit self-regenerating properties through the water-gas shift reaction, where they continuously regenerate active sites during the catalytic process. This self-service capability reduces the need for external recycling and regeneration operations, minimizing process complexity and time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Productivity

If specialized catalyst supports are used to enhance catalyst performance, then catalytic activity is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalytic activityVSAvoidcatalyst support structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the need for specialized catalyst supports by using iron oxide particles that function effectively as standalone catalysts. The iron oxide particles themselves, available as fine powders or ores, provide the necessary catalytic activity without requiring complex support structures, thereby reducing device complexity and manufacturing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent achieves high catalytic activity through optimization of temperature (600-1000°C) and pressure (0-100 bar(g)) parameters rather than through complex support structures. This parameter-based approach to enhancing catalytic activity avoids the need for specialized supports, simplifying the overall system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Achieves selective synthesis of graphitic materials with high selectivity and yield, reducing catalyst costs and enabling scalable production of various carbon morphologies without the need for specialized supports, thus enhancing commercial viability.

Implementation Method 1

contacting at elevated temperature, a metal-containing catalyst with a hydrocarbon gas to catalytically convert at least a portion of the hydrocarbon gas to hydrogen and carbon

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

contacting at elevated temperature, a metal-containing catalyst with a hydrocarbon gas wherein the temperature is between 600° C. and 1000° C.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 3

a pressure between 0 bar(g) and 100 bar(g), and wherein both the temperature and the pressure are set within predetermined value ranges to selectively synthesize graphitic material with a desired morphology

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Data Source

PatentUS12357973B2Process of controlling the morphology of graphite
Publication Date: 2025.07.15 HAZER GRP LTD
  • US12357973B2 patent drawing
  • US12357973B2 patent drawing
  • US12357973B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A process of controlling the morphology of graphite in a process for the production of graphite, the process comprising: contacting at elevated temperature, a metal-containing catalyst with a hydrocarbon gas to catalytically convert at least a portion of the hydrocarbon gas to hydrogen and carbon; wherein the temperature is between 600° C. and 1000° C. and a pressure between 0 bar(g) and 100 bar(g), and wherein both the temperature and the pressure are set within predetermined value ranges to selectively synthesize graphitic material with a desired morphology.