Graphite Negative Electrode Particle Size Control for Lithium-Ion Capacitors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Lithium-ion capacitors face challenges in energy density, output density, and cycle durability, which are unsatisfactory compared to other next-generation electricity storage devices.

Innovation Solution

A negative electrode active material made of graphite with specific particle size distribution, where D50 is between 0 and 4.0 µm and the difference between D90 and D10 is less than or equal to 7.0 µm, is used to enhance the energy and output densities and cycle durability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If graphite with conventional particle size is used for negative electrode active material, then manufacturing is easier, but energy density and output density are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy densityVSAvoidparticle size control
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing the particle size distribution parameters (D50 and D90-D10) of graphite to specific ranges. This transforms the conventional approach of using arbitrary graphite sizes into a precise parameter-controlled system that maximizes energy density and output density while maintaining manufacturability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by creating different particle size zones within the graphite distribution. By controlling the proportion of fine particles (D50 ≤ 4.0 μm) versus coarser particles, the electrode achieves local optimization where fine particles enhance energy density in contact regions while coarser particles provide structural stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If graphite with narrow particle size distribution is used, then output density and cycle durability are improved, but mixing property with binder during electrode formation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecycle durabilityVSAvoidmixing property
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the particle size distribution parameters to achieve a balanced state. By setting D50 ≤ 4.0 μm and D90-D10 ≤ 7.0 μm, it finds the optimal parameter range that simultaneously improves cycle durability through better structural stability and maintains adequate mixing properties for electrode formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by not requiring complete uniformity in particle size distribution. Instead of using monodisperse particles that would ensure perfect mixing, it allows a controlled distribution range that provides sufficient mixing while achieving the desired durability improvements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Quantity of substance

If graphite with larger particle size is used, then self-discharge is reduced, but energy density and charging/discharging efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy densityVSAvoidself-discharge
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing the particle size parameters to a specific range that balances competing effects. The D50 ≤ 4.0 μm parameter ensures sufficient surface area for high energy density and efficient charging/discharging, while the controlled D90-D10 distribution minimizes excessive fine particles that would cause self-discharge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The use of graphite with these specific particle size characteristics improves the energy density, output density, and cycle durability of lithium-ion capacitors, ensuring stable and high electric power output over a wide charging/discharging range.

Implementation Method 1

graphite powder having a particle size of less than 10 μm is not used as a negative electrode material which can absorb and desorb lithium

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption: Absorption (physical)

Implementation Method 2

an electrolyte having an aprotic organic solvent of a lithium salt

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon transport: Diffusion

Data Source

PatentEP1914764B1Lithium-ion Capacitor
Publication Date: 2016.11.30 SUBARU CORP
  • EP1914764B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1914764B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP1914764B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention provides a negative electrode material for use with a lithium-ion capacitor (10), which is high in energy density, output density and excellent in durability. When graphite of which an average distance between 002 lattice planes thereof is within a range from 0.335 nm to 0.337 nm is used for an active material of a negative electrode (12) of a lithium-ion capacitor (10), the energy density of the capacitor is increased. The output characteristic and the cycle durability can be improved when D10, D50 and D90 are set within predetermined ranges.