Fugitive Graphite-PVB Cores for CMC Cooling Cavities

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for creating cooling structures in ceramic matrix composite (CMC) components are expensive and limited in flexibility, unable to form complex shapes, and do not efficiently enhance cooling efficiency.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating fugitive graphite-polyvinyl butyral (PVB) core inserts into CMC preforms, which are then treated to remove PVB and retain graphite, forming internal cavities for cooling channels, allowing for complex shapes and improved cooling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If drilling and machining holes, pockets or channels into surfaces are used to create cooling structures, then cooling channels can be formed, but the manufacturing cost increases and manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling efficiencyVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by inserting core inserts into the preform during the manufacturing process before densification. These core inserts define the cooling channel cavities in advance, eliminating the need for subsequent expensive drilling and machining operations. The core inserts are positioned and integrated during layup, and after densification, they are removed to leave precisely formed cooling channels without requiring post-processing machining.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses core inserts as intermediary objects that temporarily occupy the space where cooling channels will eventually exist. These inserts serve as placeholders during manufacturing, guiding the formation of cooling channels without requiring direct machining of the final component. The intermediaries (core inserts) are removed after densification, leaving the desired cooling channel geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If drilling and machining holes, pockets or channels into surfaces are used to create cooling structures, then cooling channels can be formed, but the manufacturing process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling efficiencyVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling channel geometry is predetermined by inserting core inserts during preform fabrication. This preliminary action integrates cooling channel formation into the base manufacturing process rather than requiring separate, complex post-processing steps. The core inserts automatically define the channel geometry, reducing process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The core inserts serve as physical copies or templates of the desired cooling channel geometry. By copying the channel shape into the preform using these inserts, the complex geometry is transferred without requiring complex machining operations. The inserts are simple objects that replicate the channel shape, making the manufacturing process simpler.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If mandrels are inserted during layup of plies to form internal cavities, then cooling channels can be created, but the manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling channel formationVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs disposable core inserts made from inexpensive materials such as wax, plastic, or ceramic that are designed to be removed after serving their purpose. These cheap, temporary objects define the cooling channel geometry during manufacturing and are then eliminated through burnout or dissolution processes. Their low cost and single-use nature significantly reduce manufacturing expenses compared to reusable mandrels or post-processing methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The core inserts are intentionally discarded after fulfilling their function of defining cooling channel geometry. The removal process (burnout, dissolution, or extraction) eliminates these temporary objects, leaving only the desired cooling channels in the component. This discarding approach avoids the cost of creating and maintaining expensive reusable mandrels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

4Reliability

If conventional methods are used to create cooling structures, then some cooling channels can be formed, but the ability to create complex shapes is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling channel formationVSAvoidshape complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Complex cooling channel shapes are predetermined by inserting appropriately shaped core inserts during preform fabrication. This preliminary action allows any geometry that can be formed into a core insert to be replicated in the final component, enabling complex three-dimensional shapes, curved channels, and optimized thermal pathways that cannot be achieved through linear drilling or simple machining operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The core inserts serve as physical templates that copy their exact geometry into the final cooling channel structure. By designing core inserts with complex shapes, the patent can replicate these intricate geometries in the component without requiring complex machining toolpaths or multiple operations. The copying process preserves the full complexity of the insert geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables cost-effective creation of complex cooling structures within CMCs, enhancing cooling efficiency and reducing thermal stress by forming internal cavities with retained graphite support.

Implementation Method 1

subjecting the preform with the one or more integrated core inserts to a heat treatment to remove polyvinyl butyral while retaining graphite

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal decomposition: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 2

densifying the preform to form a ceramic matrix composite with the one or more internal cavities

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Data Source

PatentUS20250313513A1Cores for ceramic matrix composite components
Publication Date: 2025.10.09 RTX CORP
  • US20250313513A1 patent drawing
  • US20250313513A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The preparation of ceramic matrix composite (CMCs) is disclosed in which a ceramic matrix composite (CMC) preform is made with one or more integrated core inserts made of a fugitive material comprising graphite and polyvinyl butyral. The preform with integrated core inserts is subjected to a heat treatment to remove the polyvinyl butyral (e.g., by melting or burning) while retaining the graphite. Removal of the polyvinyl butyral results in formation of one or more internal cavities within the preform in which the retained graphite aids in maintaining the shape of the internal cavities. The preform can then be subjected to densification to form a composite and the remaining graphite can be removed from the internal cavities.