Grateless, back drafted and back fed pellet stove

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional wood pellet stoves are complex, difficult to maintain, expensive, and require significant electricity, making them unreliable and less popular during power failures.

Innovation Solution

A simplified pellet stove design that uses gravity to dispense pellets, eliminates the need for a burner basket, and operates on minimal electricity, featuring a pellet tube, insulator, deflector plate, and draft inducer, allowing for efficient combustion and easy assembly from few components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If a conventional pellet stove system with pellet feeder and burner basket is used, then automated pellet feeding and combustion control are achieved, but device complexity and maintenance difficulty increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated pellet feedingVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the pellet feeder mechanism entirely from the system. Instead of automated feeding, pellets are manually loaded into a hopper and then gravity-fed through a simple auger or tube system to the burn pot, eliminating the complex electric motor-driven pellet feeder while maintaining adequate fuel delivery

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent inverts the conventional approach by eliminating the automated pellet feeder and instead using a simple gravity-based delivery system combined with manual intervention. This reversal of the automation approach reduces complexity while achieving the essential function of pellet delivery

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Productivity

If a burner basket is used to hold pellets during combustion, then efficient burning is achieved, but the basket corrodes quickly under high temperatures and requires frequent replacement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion efficiencyVSAvoidbasket durability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent completely removes the burner basket from the system. Pellets are burned directly in the burn pot without being contained in a separate basket, eliminating the component that corrodes under high temperatures. The burn pot itself is designed to withstand the thermal environment without requiring frequent replacement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the function of the burner basket with the burn pot structure. Instead of having a separate basket that holds pellets and is exposed to intense heat, the design integrates fuel containment and combustion in a single robust chamber that is designed to handle the thermal load

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If exotic refractory materials are used to fabricate the burner basket to slow corrosion, then component durability is improved, but manufacturing cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebasket durabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By removing the burner basket entirely, the patent eliminates the need for expensive refractory materials. The burn pot is designed to handle the thermal load directly, allowing the use of simpler, more cost-effective materials that are easier to manufacture and replace

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Extent of automation

If multiple electric motors are used to drive the pellet feeder, combustion blower, and room air blower, then automated operation and combustion control are achieved, but electricity consumption increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated operationVSAvoidelectricity consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the electric motor that drives the pellet feeder. Pellet delivery is achieved through gravity and simple mechanical means that require minimal or no electrical power, dramatically reducing overall electricity consumption while maintaining adequate fuel delivery to the burn pot

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution reduces maintenance costs, minimizes exposure to high temperatures, operates independently of electricity, and provides consistent and efficient heat production, enhancing reliability and scalability.

Implementation Method 1

The draft inducer creates negative pressure inside the combustion chamber to draw combustion air through the pellet tube and across the combustion chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNegative pressure: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

pellets fall onto a flat surface... Pellets are dispensed by gravity into combustion zone

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Implementation Method 3

Insulator prevents the flame from heating the pellets in pellet tube

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal insulation: Thermal Insulation

Implementation Method 4

combustion is initiated... combustion air flow and the room air flow can be accurately controlled... source of clean heat

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentUS12146657B2Grateless, back drafted and back fed pellet stove
Publication Date: 2024.11.19 SPEVAK STEPHEN THOMAS
  • US12146657B2 patent drawing
  • US12146657B2 patent drawing
  • US12146657B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for combusting fuel comprising an apparatus that receives fuel that is characterized as comprising interstitial spacing and wherein oxidants pass through the interstitial spacing of the fuel to sustain a combustion reaction at the interface of a reaction chamber while the byproducts of combustion pass into the reaction chamber.