Gravity Flow Micro-Physiological Article for Drug Response Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional microphysiological systems are insensitive to toxic metabolites, unreliable due to sample leakage, prone to air bubble uptake, and fail due to active components ceasing function, limiting their effectiveness in determining physiological responses to drugs.

Innovation Solution

A gravity flow micro-physiological article comprising a substrate with supply chambers, a mixing chamber, and a liquid divider that uses gravitational force to divide and combine fluid flows, allowing biological cells to respond to a drug surrogate, thereby determining physiological responses independently and proportionately.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional microphysiological systems use active components (pumps, valves) to control fluid flow, then fluid flow control is achieved, but the system fails when active components cease function

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidactive components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes active components (pumps, valves) from the microphysiological system entirely, extracting the problematic elements that caused reliability issues. Fluid flow is achieved passively through gravitational force and pressure gradients, eliminating the need for mechanical components that can fail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses self-service mechanisms where fluid flow is driven by inherent physical principles (gravity, pressure gradients) rather than external active control. The device automatically regulates flow through its design geometry and fluid properties, requiring no external power or control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If conventional microphysiological systems use closed systems with pumps and valves, then fluid flow control is precise, but sample leakage occurs making the system unreliable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleak-free operationVSAvoidclosed system components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device is divided into multiple independent chambers (first chamber, second chamber, third chamber) that are fluidically connected but structurally separate. This segmentation allows each chamber to function independently, preventing leakage from compromising the entire system while maintaining controlled fluid flow between chambers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent eliminates valves and seals from the system design, removing the components that are prone to leakage. Fluid flow between chambers is controlled through passive pressure gradients and gravity rather than mechanical valve closure, ensuring leak-free operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If conventional microphysiological systems use mechanical pumping systems, then fluid flow rates are controllable, but air bubbles are taken up causing system failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveair bubble free operationVSAvoidmechanical pumping system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes mechanical pumping systems entirely, eliminating the source of air bubble introduction. Fluid is introduced into the system through open reservoirs and flows passively through the device, preventing air entrapment that occurs with mechanical pump operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using active pumping to push fluid through the system (which can trap air), the system inverts the approach by using gravity and pressure gradients to pull fluid through. Fluid enters from open reservoirs and flows downward through the chambers, allowing air bubbles to naturally rise and escape rather than being trapped by mechanical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

4Productivity

If conventional microphysiological systems are complex with multiple active components, then physiological responses can be studied, but the cost and complexity reduce effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrug screening throughputVSAvoidsystem components
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device uses segmented chambers that can be independently configured for different cell types and drug treatments. Multiple test conditions can be run in parallel across different chambers, maintaining high productivity while using simple, standardized chamber designs that reduce overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The device design uses universal, multi-functional components that can serve multiple purposes. The same chamber structure and fluid flow principles apply across different experimental configurations, allowing the system to handle various drug screening scenarios without requiring specialized complex components for each application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This system overcomes the limitations of conventional systems by providing a reliable, leak-free, and efficient method for determining physiological responses to drugs, mimicking physiological conditions, and enabling controlled pharmacokinetic studies with reduced costs and increased throughput.

Implementation Method 1

a liquid divider in fluid communication with the mixing chamber and that: receives the combined fluid flow from the mixing chamber; and divides the combined fluid flow into a first divided fluid flow and a second divided fluid flow

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitational force: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS20220134331A1Gravity flow micro-physiological article and determining a physiological response to a drug
Publication Date: 2022.05.05 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
  • US20220134331A1 patent drawing
  • US20220134331A1 patent drawing
  • US20220134331A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A gravity flow micro-physiological article determines a physiological response to a drug and includes: supply chambers; a mixing chamber; and a liquid divider, wherein the divider divides fluid under gravitational force so that individual portions of the fluid independently include metabolites in a proportionate amount as physically determined by the liquid divider.