Gravity-Actuated Hooking Device for Lifeboat Block Retention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing crane systems for lifeboats, particularly those without movable arms, face challenges in safely retaining blocks during lifting and rest positions, requiring complex and costly solutions to avoid permanent deformation and ensure reliable operation under varying sea conditions, while also needing to prevent accidental lowering and damage from block inertia.

Innovation Solution

A mechanical hooking device that utilizes the rising and lowering movements of the block to facilitate locking and unlocking operations, operated manually by the operator through a mechanical lever system, eliminating the need for additional energy sources and movable arms, and incorporating adjustable mechanisms to manage clearances and operation modes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If automatic unlocking systems with energy reserves (hydraulic, pneumatic, or electric) are used, then the reliability of block retention is improved, but the device complexity and cost increase due to additional circuits and energy storage requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblock retention reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The block's own weight and movement serve the unlocking function. During lowering, gravity automatically triggers the unlocking mechanism without requiring external energy sources, hydraulic systems, or pneumatic circuits. The system uses the load itself to perform the unlocking action, eliminating complex energy storage requirements while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts and eliminates the complex energy reserve systems (hydraulic, pneumatic, electric) from the unlocking mechanism. By removing these unnecessary components and using only mechanical gravity-based operation, the system achieves reliable unlocking without the complexity and cost of additional circuits and energy storage devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Device complexity

If mechanical locking systems using arm movement are used, then the structure is simplified, but they cannot be applied to stationary installations without movable arms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure complexityVSAvoidapplicability to stationary installations
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The unlocking mechanism is designed to be universally applicable to both movable arm cranes and stationary installations. By using gravity-based operation that works independently of arm movement, the same mechanical principle can be applied across different crane types, making the system versatile and adaptable to various installation configurations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using arm movement to trigger unlocking (as in conventional systems), the invention inverts the approach by using the block's downward movement under gravity to trigger unlocking. This reversal allows the system to work in stationary installations where arm movement is unavailable, while maintaining structural simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Reliability

If the block is kept under permanent tension to maintain hooked condition, then the retention reliability is improved, but permanent deformation and damage to cables occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehooked condition retentionVSAvoidcable integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic tensioning and loosening of the lifting cables rather than permanent tension. The block automatically hooks during lifting operations and can be securely retained, but the system allows for periodic loosening to prevent permanent deformation. This cyclic operation maintains reliability while protecting cable strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system takes preliminary action to prevent cable damage by designing the retention mechanism to secure the block during lifting without requiring permanent cable tension. The mechanical locking system provides retention through structural engagement rather than continuous cable tension, preventing the harmful effect of permanent deformation before it can occur

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

4Reliability

If manual operation is used to prevent accidental lowering, then the safety is improved, but the productivity and automation level decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety against accidental loweringVSAvoidoperation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The hooking operation is automated through self-service mechanism where the block's own upward movement automatically triggers the locking action. During lowering, the system provides safety through automatic unlocking at the appropriate moment. This eliminates the need for continuous manual intervention while maintaining safety, thereby improving productivity without sacrificing reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a reliable, safe, and cost-effective automatic locking and controlled unlocking system for lifeboat blocks, minimizing maintenance and preventing anomalous stresses and damage, suitable for stationary installations and other crane types, ensuring secure operation across different sea conditions.

Implementation Method 1

A mechanical hooking device that utilizes the rising and lowering movements of the block to facilitate locking and unlocking operations, operated manually by the operator through a mechanical lever system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical advantage: Mechanical Advantage

Data Source

PatentUS9074723B2Hooking and releasing device for blocks
Publication Date: 2015.07.07 NAVALIMPIANTI
  • US9074723B2 patent drawing
  • US9074723B2 patent drawing
  • US9074723B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Automatic hooking device with controlled releasing operation is mounted to a ship or other transportation device with a hooking member having an engaging member operated by ascending movement of a block and fixed to a support structure on lifting blocks, the hooking device is a system of moveable levers reciprocally interconnected by pins, the levers move the hooking device between two end positions to engage or release with the block depending on if the hooking device is in the engaging or releasing position, where a control device operates the hooking device and levers to move the hooking device between the engaging or releasing position to secure or release the block.