Gravity Injection Molding for Compression Molding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Compression molding requires high capital investment and pressure, making it inefficient for lower production volumes and resulting in low fiber fractions due to viscosity issues.

Innovation Solution

A molding apparatus with a top platen having slots for gravity depositing molding material into a bottom mold portion, reducing the need for high pressure and simplifying the mold design by allowing the top mold portion to move between loading and forming positions, with an actuator controlling the movement and a press for final molding.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If high pressure compression molding is used, then molding capability is improved, but capital investment and equipment cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemolding capabilityVSAvoidcapital investment
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The molding process is segmented into two distinct phases: a gravity-fed material deposition phase followed by a lower-pressure compression phase. This segmentation eliminates the need for high-capacity presses during material loading, reducing equipment requirements and capital investment while maintaining molding capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Molding material is preliminarily deposited into the bottom mold portion using gravity feed before the compression phase begins. This preliminary action prepares the material in position, allowing the subsequent compression phase to operate at lower pressures since the material is already properly positioned and distributed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If high pressure is applied during compression molding, then material density is improved, but fiber fraction decreases due to viscosity problems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial densityVSAvoidfiber fraction
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The process uses periodic action by applying pressure in stages: first allowing gravity-fed deposition without pressure, then applying compression pressure only during the final molding phase. This periodic application of pressure prevents excessive viscosity buildup that would occur with continuous high-pressure application, thereby preserving fiber fraction while achieving proper material density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The pressure parameter is changed over time - starting at zero during gravity deposition, then increasing to compression levels only after material placement. This dynamic parameter change optimizes both fiber preservation during deposition and material density during the compression phase, avoiding the trade-off present in traditional continuous high-pressure molding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If top mold portion remains stationary over bottom mold portion, then molding precision is maintained, but material deposition complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemolding precisionVSAvoidmold design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The top mold portion is made dynamic by allowing it to move between a retracted position during gravity-fed material deposition and a closed position during compression molding. This dynamic configuration simplifies the deposition process by creating open access to the bottom mold portion, while molding precision is maintained when the top mold portion is positioned correctly for compression.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Significantly reduces the complexity and cost of mold portions and the pressure required for molding, enabling more efficient production of articles with reduced fiber breakage and improved fiber fraction.

Implementation Method 1

The molding material may be gravity deposited into the bottom mold portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS7931845B2Gravity injection of molding material for compression molding and related methods
Publication Date: 2011.04.26 LRM IND INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US7931845B2 patent drawing
  • US7931845B2 patent drawing
  • US7931845B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A molding apparatus includes a bottom platen, a bottom mold portion carried by the bottom platen, and a top platen overlying the bottom platen and the bottom mold portion. The top platen includes slots extending therethrough for receiving a molding material. The molding material is to be gravity deposited into the bottom mold portion. A top mold portion is carried by the top platen and is moveable between a molding material loading position and an article forming position. An actuator is coupled to the top mold portion for moving the top mold portion between the molding material loading position and the article forming position. The molding material loading position corresponds to when the top mold portion is non-overlying the bottom mold portion so that the molding material can be gravity deposited therein. The article forming position corresponds to when the top mold portion is overlying the bottom mold portion for molding an article.