Greenhouse Crop Control Using Demand Forecasting and Sensor Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for managing greenhouse operations, such as sowing and harvesting, fail to ensure adequate and non-wasteful produce delivery while inadequately addressing changing environmental conditions.

Innovation Solution

A networked greenhouse control system that communicates with remote enterprise resource planning systems to predict demand, generate crop production instructions, and optimize pallet loading, using sensors and automated equipment for precise crop management and harvesting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional approaches are used for sowing and harvesting in greenhouses, then operations can be performed with simple methods, but adequate and non-wasteful produce delivery cannot be ensured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduce delivery reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the greenhouse management into distinct functional modules: demand planning engine for prediction, crop management module for production instructions, harvest management module for picking instructions, and pallet management module for loading instructions. Each module handles specific aspects independently, improving reliability through specialized functionality while managing complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where the demand planning engine receives actual sales data and forecast accuracy information to continuously improve predictions. The crop management system receives harvest data to adjust production instructions, and the pallet management system receives shipping data to optimize loading patterns. This feedback mechanism ensures reliable produce delivery by adapting to actual performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If conventional approaches are used for managing greenhouse operations, then operations can be performed with simple processes, but changing environmental conditions cannot be adequately addressed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental condition adaptabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts crop production instructions based on real-time environmental sensor data from greenhouses. The demand planning engine continuously updates predictions as new sales data becomes available, and the crop management module modifies sowing and harvesting instructions in response to changing conditions. This dynamic adaptation enables the system to handle environmental variations without requiring overly complex manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If demand planning is implemented to predict crop demand, then produce delivery can be optimized, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduce delivery efficiencyVSAvoidplanning system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The demand planning engine performs preliminary demand prediction before the actual harvesting and shipping operations. By forecasting crop demand in advance based on historical sales data and market trends, the system can pre-plan production schedules, harvest timing, and pallet configurations. This preliminary action improves delivery efficiency by preventing last-minute adjustments while keeping the system structure manageable through sequential processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Manufacturing precision

If automated crop management is implemented, then harvesting precision can be improved, but operational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharvesting precisionVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The crop management system generates its own production and harvest instructions automatically based on demand predictions and environmental data. The system self-adjusts sowing schedules, harvest timing, and pallet loading configurations without requiring manual intervention for each decision. This self-service capability maintains harvesting precision while simplifying operations by eliminating the need for complex manual coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11830088B2Greenhouse agriculture system
Publication Date: 2023.11.28 EDIBLE GARDEN AG INC
  • US11830088B2 patent drawing
  • US11830088B2 patent drawing
  • US11830088B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are disclosed configured to control the planting, application of pesticides, and harvesting of greenhouse crops, such as herbs. The greenhouse may include a variety of sensors, such as moisture sensors, ph sensors, and/or CO2 sensors. Unmanned vehicles may be utilized to capture crop images, and a learning engine may be used to determine the size of greenhouse crops. Such sensor data may be used to predict crop availability. A predication engine may be utilized to predict demand for greenhouse crops using current and historical orders for greenhouse crops. Greenhouse crop production instructions may be generated and transmitted to a greenhouse computer system to cause crops to be sown or harvested. Pallet loading instructions may be generated regarding the loading of specified quantities of crop packs on respective pallets for shipment to a destination.