Electrical Grid Control Using Reinforcement Learning and Multi-Particle Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing control systems for managing electrical power generation and other physical systems face challenges in handling uncertainty and varying inputs, particularly in determining optimal control actions under dynamic conditions.

Innovation Solution

An automated control system utilizing multi-particle modeling and reinforcement learning to iteratively optimize control actions based on current state information, updating models with actual outcomes to improve future predictions and adapt to changing conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional control systems are used for managing electrical power generation, then system structure is simpler and easier to implement, but the system cannot effectively handle uncertainty and dynamic changes in power generation and load conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to dynamic conditionsVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system transitions from static to dynamic operation by continuously updating particle representations of system states and using reinforcement learning to adapt control policies in real-time based on changing grid conditions, load demands, and power generation capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple particles are introduced as intermediary representations that model different possible system states and their probabilistic transitions. These particles serve as mediators between the complex physical system and the control decision-making process, enabling the system to handle uncertainty without requiring complete system knowledge

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If reinforcement learning with multi-particle modeling is implemented, then the system can learn optimal control actions and handle uncertainty effectively, but computational complexity and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol accuracy under uncertaintyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control problem is segmented into multiple independent particle representations, each modeling a possible system state. This segmentation allows parallel computation of particle updates and enables the system to explore multiple scenarios simultaneously, improving reliability while distributing computational load

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by representing system states as probability distributions over multiple particles rather than deterministic values. This parameter transformation enables the reinforcement learning algorithm to learn optimal policies that are robust to uncertainty while the iterative update process gradually refines control accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If the control system continuously updates models with actual outcomes, then prediction accuracy and adaptability improve over time, but the amount of data processing and model updating increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestate estimation accuracyVSAvoidmodel updating time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control system performs continuous model updating and particle refinement during normal operation rather than requiring separate training phases. The reinforcement learning agent continuously learns from actual system outcomes, and particle representations are continuously refined based on new observations, maintaining accuracy without stopping system operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where actual system outcomes are compared with predicted outcomes from particle models. This feedback drives both the reinforcement learning policy updates and the particle model refinements, progressively improving state estimation accuracy while using the feedback efficiency to minimize time loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11892809B2Controlling operation of an electrical grid using reinforcement learning and multi-particle modeling
Publication Date: 2024.02.06 VERITONE INC
  • US11892809B2 patent drawing
  • US11892809B2 patent drawing
  • US11892809B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are described for implementing an automated control system to control operations of a target physical system, such as production of electrical power in an electrical grid. The techniques may include determining how much electrical power for each of multiple producers to supply for each of a series of time periods, such as to satisfy projected demand for that time period while maximizing one or more indicated goals, and initiating corresponding control actions. The techniques may further include repeatedly performing automated modifications to the control system's ongoing operations to improve the target system's functionality, by using reinforcement learning to iteratively optimize particles generated for a time period that represent different state information within the target system, to learn one or more possible solutions for satisfying projected electrical power load during that time period while best meeting the one or more defined goals.